首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics >Where cost, medical necessity, and morality meet: should US government insurance programs pay for erectile dysfunction drugs?
【24h】

Where cost, medical necessity, and morality meet: should US government insurance programs pay for erectile dysfunction drugs?

机译:在满足成本,医疗必要性和道德的地方:美国政府保险计划应为勃起功能障碍药物付款吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Spending for the three most popular phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitor drugs to treat erectile dysfunction (ED) tops Dollars 1 billion worldwide annually. Using Medicaid and Medicare Part D as examples, we explore here whether US government insurance programs with limited budgets should reimburse for this class of ED drugs and review the common bases for justifying and denying reimbursement. We conclude that the clinical usefulness and costs of such drugs should be the primary drivers of coverage decisions, not moral attitudes toward sexual performance.
机译:用于治疗勃起功能障碍(ED)的三种最流行的磷酸二酯酶(PDE)抑制剂药物的全球每年花费超过10亿美元。以Medicaid和Medicare D部分为例,我们在这里探讨预算有限的美国政府保险计划是否应为此类ED药物报销,并审查合理和拒绝报销的通用基础。我们得出的结论是,此类药物的临床实用性和成本应该是承保决定的主要驱动力,而不是对性行为的道德态度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号