【24h】

A comparison of EMG-based muscle fatigue assessments during dynamic contractions

机译:动态收缩期间基于肌电图的肌肉疲劳评估的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Several EMG-based approaches to muscle fatigue assessment have recently been proposed in the literature. In this work, two multivariate fatigue indices developed by the authors: a generalized mapping index (GMI) and the first component of principal component analysis (PCA) were compared to three univariate indices: Dimitrov's normalized spectral moments (NSM), Gonzalez-Izal's waveletbased indices (WI), and Talebinejad's fractal-based Hurst Exponent (HE). Nine healthy participants completed two repetitions of fatigue tests during isometric, cyclic and random fatiguing contractions of the biceps brachii. The fatigue assessments were evaluated in terms of a modified sensitivity to variability ratio yielding the following scores (mean ± std.dev.): PCA: (12.6 ± 5.6), GMI: (11.5 ± 5.4), NSM: (10.3 ± 5.4), WI: (8.9 ± 4.6), HE: (8.0 ± 3.3). It was shown that PCA statistically outperformed WI and HE (p< 0.01) and that GMI outperformed HE (p<0.02). There was no statistical difference among NSM, WI and HE (p>0.2). It was found that taking the natural logarithm of NSM and WI, although reducing the parameters' sensitivity to fatigue, increased SVR scores by reducing variability.
机译:最近在文献中提出了几种基于肌电图的肌肉疲劳评估方法。在这项工作中,作者开发了两个多元疲劳指数:广义映射指数(GMI)和主成分分析的第一成分(PCA)与三个单变量指数:Dimitrov的归一化谱矩(NSM),基于Gonzalez-Izal小波的指数(WI)和基于Talebinejad分形的赫斯特指数(HE)。九名健康参与者在肱二头肌的等距,周期性和随机疲劳收缩期间完成了两次疲劳测试。疲劳评估是根据对变异性比率的修改敏感性进行评估的,得出以下得分(平均值±标准偏差):PCA:(12.6±5.6),GMI:(11.5±5.4),NSM:(10.3±5.4) ,WI:(8.9±4.6),HE:(8.0±3.3)。结果表明,PCA在统计学上胜过WI和HE(p <0.01),而GMI胜过HE(p <0.02)。 NSM,WI和HE之间无统计学差异(p> 0.2)。结果发现,采用NSM和WI的自然对数,虽然可以降低参数对疲劳的敏感性,但可以通过减少变异性来增加SVR分数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号