首页> 外文期刊>Clinical scholars review. >Research Participation: A Moral Obligation?
【24h】

Research Participation: A Moral Obligation?

机译:研究参与:道德义务?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We as a society have all benefited from past research. These benefits include immunizations, antibiotics, antihypertensive, diabetic medication, and many more. Clinical research is ongoing, looking for better treatments, improved technologies, and cures for diseases. Unfortunately, enrollment into these research studies is often low and can become the barrier to completing the study. Why do so few people participate in trials and yet expect researchers to find cures? Should the public benefit from the latest treatments without ever having to participate in the process? Do we have a moral obligation to participate in research or should it be left to the altruistic members of society alone? Differing views of this argument are explored.
机译:我们这个社会都从过去的研究中受益。这些好处包括免疫接种,抗生素,降压药,糖尿病药物等等。正在进行临床研究,以寻求更好的治疗方法,改进的技术以及治疗疾病的方法。不幸的是,这些研究的入学率通常很低,并且可能成为完成研究的障碍。为什么这么少的人参加试验却又期望研究人员找到治疗方法?公众是否应该从最新的治疗中受益,而不必参与该过程?我们是否有参加研究的道德义务,还是应该留给无私的社会成员?探索了对此论点的不同看法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号