首页> 外文期刊>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition >Aspects of endowment: A query theory of value construction
【24h】

Aspects of endowment: A query theory of value construction

机译:of赋方面:价值建构的查询理论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

How do people judge the monetary value of objects? One clue is provided by the typical endowment study (D. Kahneman, J. L. Knetsch, & R. H. Thaler, 1991), in which participants are randomly given either a good, such as a coffee mug, that they may later sell ("sellers") or a choice between the good and amounts of cash ("choosers"). Sellers typically demand at least twice as much as choosers, inconsistent with economic theory. This result is usually explained by an increased weighting of losses, or loss aversion. The authors provide a memory-based account of endowment, suggesting that people construct values by posing a series of queries whose order differs for sellers and choosers. Because of output interference, these queries retrieve different aspects of the object and the medium of exchange, producing different valuations. The authors show that the content and structure of the recalled aspects differ for selling and choosing and that these aspects predict valuations. Merely altering the order in which queries are posed can eliminate the endowment effect, and changing the order of queries can produce endowment-like effects without ownership.
机译:人们如何判断物品的货币价值?典型的捐赠研究(D. Kahneman,JL Knetsch和RH Thaler,1991年)提供了一个线索,其中,参与者被随机分配了一种商品,例如咖啡杯,以后可以出售(“卖家”)。或在商品和现金金额之间进行选择(“选择者”)。卖方通常要求选择者的需求至少是选择者的两倍,这与经济理论不一致。通常通过增加损失加权或损失规避来解释此结果。作者提供了一个基于记忆的捐赠帐户,建议人们通过提出一系列查询来构造价值,这些查询的顺序对于卖方和选择者而言是不同的。由于输出干扰,这些查询检索对象和交换媒介的不同方面,从而产生不同的估价。作者表明,召回方面的内容和结构因销售和选择而异,并且这些方面可预测估值。仅仅改变查询的顺序可以消除effect赋效应,而更改查询的顺序可以产生类似ownership赋的效果而没有所有权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号