首页> 外文期刊>Journal of experimental psychology. human perception and performance >Eye Movements During Scene Recollection Have a Functional Role, but They Are Not Reinstatements of Those Produced During Encoding
【24h】

Eye Movements During Scene Recollection Have a Functional Role, but They Are Not Reinstatements of Those Produced During Encoding

机译:场景回忆过程中的眼动功能具有一定的作用,但并不是恢复编码过程中产生的眼动

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Current debate in mental imagery research revolves around the perceptual and cognitive role of eye movements to “nothing” (Ferreira, Apel, & Henderson, 2008; Richardson, Altmann, Spivey, & Hoover, 2009). While it is established that eye movements are comparable when inspecting a scene (or hearing a scene description) as when visualizing it from memory (Johansson, Holsanova, & Holmqvist, 2006), the exact purpose of these eye movements remains elusive. Are eye movements during recall purely epiphenomenal or do they have a functional purpose? Here we address this question in four experiments where eye movements were prohibited either during the encoding or recall phases. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that maintaining central fixation during visual or auditory encoding, respectively, had no effect on how eye movements were executed during recall (but it did hinder memory retrieval). Thus, oculomotor events during recall are not reinstatements of those produced during encoding. When fixation was restricted during recall, Experiments 3 and 4 revealed that scene recollection was altered and impaired, irrespective of the modality of encoding. The functional role of eye movements during mental visualization is therefore apparent in this perturbation of visuospatial capabilities.
机译:当前在心理图像研究中的争论围绕着眼球运动对“什么都没有”的感知和认知作用展开(Ferreira,Apel和Henderson,2008; Richardson,Altmann,Spivey和Hoover,2009)。虽然已经确定眼动在检查场景(或听到场景描述)时与从内存中可视化时具有可比性(Johansson,Holsanova和Holmqvist,2006年),但这些眼动的确切目的仍然难以捉摸。回忆中的眼球运动是纯粹的表观现象,还是有功能目的?在这里,我们在四个实验中解决了这个问题,在编码或回忆阶段都禁止眼睛运动。实验1和2表明,分别在视觉或听觉编码过程中保持中央注视不会影响召回过程中眼动的执行方式(但确实会妨碍记忆的检索)。因此,召回期间的动眼事件不是编码期间产生的动眼事件。当在回忆中限制固定时,实验3和4揭示了场景记忆的改变和受损,而不管编码的方式如何。因此,在视觉可视化能力的这种扰动中,眼动在心理可视化过程中的功能作用显而易见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号