首页> 外文期刊>Journal of experimental psychology. human perception and performance >Is object-based attention mandatory? Strategic control over mode of attention
【24h】

Is object-based attention mandatory? Strategic control over mode of attention

机译:基于对象的注意是强制性的吗?对注意力模式的战略控制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Is object-based attention mandatory or under strategic control? In an adapted spatial cuing paradigm, participants focused initially on a central arrow cue that was part of a perceptual group (Experiment 1) or a uniformly connected object (Experiment 2), encompassing one of the potential target locations. The cue always pointed to an opposite, different-object location. By varying cue validity, the strategic incentive to prevent the spread of attention to the entire cue object, and consequently to the same-object location, was manipulated: With invalid cuing and (consequently) equal probability of targets at same-object and different-object locations, a same-object target identification advantage was observed. With highly valid cuing and targets much more probable at the different-object location than at the same-object location, the same-object advantage disappeared. Object-based attention appears to be a default mode that may be ecologically adaptive but can be overridden by strategic control when there is a strong immediate benefit in doing so.
机译:基于对象的注意是强制性的还是受策略控制的?在一种适应性的空间提示范式中,参与者最初将注意力集中在中央箭头提示上,该箭头提示是感知组(实验1)或均匀连接的对象(实验2)的一部分,包含潜在的目标位置之一。提示总是指向相反的,不同的对象位置。通过改变提示的有效性,控制了防止注意力分散到整个提示对象以及相应对象位置的策略性激励措施:无效提示和(因此)目标在相同对象和不同对象上的概率相等。物体位置,观察到相同物体目标识别优势。具有高度有效的提示,并且在不同对象位置比在相同对象位置更有可能成为目标,相同对象的优势消失了。基于对象的注意力似乎是一种默认模式,该模式可能具有生态适应性,但是当这样做有很大的直接好处时,可以被战略控制所取代。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号