...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of family therapy >A social relational critique of the biomedical definition and treatment of ADHD; ethical practical and political implications
【24h】

A social relational critique of the biomedical definition and treatment of ADHD; ethical practical and political implications

机译:对多动症的生物医学定义和治疗的社会关系批评;伦理上的实践和政治影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), its existence and treatment, is a contentious matter. The dominant view in medicine considers that ADHD is a psychiatric disorder. My position is to challenge this from a social relational orientation. I explore here a critique of the psychiatric disease model of causation and treatment, particularly the use of medication. A series of prejudices based on a political and social constructionist orientation are offered to address the ethics, politics and practice implications of the practitioner critical of the biomedical model of diagnosis and treatment especially the use of medication. This device is employed in order to invite critical reflection and further debate in a field dominated by the medical and genetic arguments in support of ADHD as a psychiatric disease. The implications of more open debate are explored, together with directions for more politically and ethically informed practice with children and their families.
机译:注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的存在和治疗是一个有争议的问题。医学上的主流观点认为,ADHD是一种精神疾病。我的立场是从社会关系取向挑战这一点。我在这里探讨对因果关系和治疗的精神病模型的批评,尤其是药物的使用。提供了一系列基于政治和社会建构主义倾向的偏见,以解决从业者对诊断和治疗的生物医学模型(尤其是药物的使用)提出批评的伦理,政治和实践含义。使用该装置是为了在医学和遗传学观点主导的领域中引起批评性思考和进一步辩论,以支持多动症作为一种精神疾病。探索了更开放的辩论的意义,以及与儿童及其家庭进行更多政治和道德知情实践的方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号