首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Equine Veterinary Science >Comparison of Three Methods for Evaluation of Equine Insulin Regulation in Horses of Varied Body Condition Score
【24h】

Comparison of Three Methods for Evaluation of Equine Insulin Regulation in Horses of Varied Body Condition Score

机译:三种评估身体状况得分马马胰岛素调节方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Multiple dynamic field tests are used for assessment of equine insulin resistance or altered insulin regulation. However, the relationship between markers of glucose homeostasis and insulin disposal obtained by different testing protocols is unknown. We hypothesized that two recently developed field tests for evaluation of equine insulin dysregulation, the insulin response to dexamethasone test (IRDT) and oral sugar test (OST), would yield comparable results to the hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (HEC). Fifteen light breed horses with body condition scores (BCS) 3 of 9 to 8 of 9 were used in this study. Eight horses (BCS, 5 of 9 to 7 of 9) underwent an OST under two different housing conditions, pasture, and stall (experiment 1). These eight horses also underwent an HEC and IRDT over a 4-week period (experiment 2), and results were compared with the OST stall. Finally, eight horses (BC5, 3 of 9 to 8 of 9), including one horse from experiments 1 and 2, underwent an OST on pasture three times over a 14-16-week period during the summer and the fall (experiment 3). The HEC did not correlate with either the OST or IRDT. The OST was not different when performed in the pasture compared within a stall but did change significantly over time on pasture. These results suggest that in insulin-sensitive horses, the OST and IRDT results are not primarily determined by tissue insulin sensitivity in horses of varying BCS. Furthermore, OST results may vary depending on pasture composition or season. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:多个动态现场测试用于评估马胰岛素抵抗或改变的胰岛素调节。但是,通过不同的测试方案获得的葡萄糖稳态指标与胰岛素处置之间的关系尚不清楚。我们假设两个最近开发的用于评估马胰岛素失调的现场测试,即对地塞米松测试(IRDT)和口服糖测试(OST)的胰岛素反应,将产生与高胰岛素正常血糖钳(HEC)相当的结果。在本研究中使用了15匹身体状况得分(BCS)为3的9至8的轻型马。 8匹马(BCS,9中的5至9中的7)在两种不同的住房条件,牧场和档位下进行了OST(实验1)。这八匹马还进行了为期4周的HEC和IRDT(实验2),并将结果与​​OST档进行了比较。最后,在夏季和秋季的14-16周内,对8匹马(BC5,第9步中的3到9,第8步中的3匹),包括来自实验1和2的一匹马,在牧场上进行了3次OST(实验3) 。 HEC与OST或IRDT均不相关。与在畜栏内比较时,在牧场上进行的OST没什么不同,但是随着时间的推移,OST确实发生了显着变化。这些结果表明,在胰岛素敏感性马匹中,OST和IRDT结果并非主要由不同BCS的马匹中组织胰岛素敏感性决定。此外,OST结果可能因牧场组成或季节而异。 (C)2014 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号