首页> 外文期刊>Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders >Validation of the rowland universal dementia assessment scale for multicultural screening in danish memory clinics
【24h】

Validation of the rowland universal dementia assessment scale for multicultural screening in danish memory clinics

机译:丹麦记忆诊所对多文化筛查的Rowland通用痴呆评估量表的验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background/Aims: The Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS) is a brief cognitive screening test that was developed to detect dementia in multicultural populations. The RUDAS has not previously been validated in multicultural populations outside of Australia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the RUDAS in a multicultural sample of patients referred to Danish memory clinics. Methods: Data were collected from 137 consecutive patients (34 with an immigrant background) in three Danish memory clinics. All patients were given the RUDAS as a supplement to the standard diagnostic workup. Results: Diagnostic accuracy for the RUDAS [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.838] was similar to that of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE; AUC = 0.840). The cutoff score with the best balance of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy was <24/30 for the RUDAS (sensitivity 0.69, specificity 0.80) and <25/30 for the MMSE (sensitivity 0.76, specificity 0.83). In contrast to the MMSE, regression analyses revealed that the RUDAS was unaffected by factors related to the patients' immigrant backgrounds. Conclusion: The RUDAS showed high specificity and proved to be less affected by cultural and linguistic factors than the MMSE, making it a particularly valuable tool when screening for cognitive impairment in elderly multicultural patient populations.
机译:背景/目的:罗兰通用痴呆评估量表(RUDAS)是一种简短的认知筛查测试,旨在检测多元文化人群中的痴呆。 RUDAS之前尚未在澳大利亚以外的多元文化人群中得到验证。这项研究的目的是评估在丹麦记忆诊所转诊的多文化患者样本中RUDAS的诊断准确性。方法:从丹麦三间记忆诊所的137位连续患者(34位具有移民背景)中收集数据。所有患者均接受RUDAS作为标准诊断检查的补充。结果:RUDAS的诊断准确性[曲线下面积(AUC)= 0.838]与迷你精神状态检查(MMSE; AUC = 0.840)相似。对于RUDAS,灵敏度,特异性和准确性达到最佳平衡的临界值是<24/30(敏感性0.69,特异性0.80),而对于MMSE则是<25/30(敏感性0.76,特异性0.83)。与MMSE相比,回归分析显示RUDAS不受与患者移民背景相关的因素的影响。结论:RUDAS具有较高的特异性,并且与MMSE相比,受文化和语言因素的影响较小,使其成为筛查老年多元文化患者群体认知障碍的特别有价值的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号