...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Planning and Management >Defining an Ecological Baseline for Restoration and Natural Resource Damage Assessment of Contaminated Sites: The Case of the Department of Energy
【24h】

Defining an Ecological Baseline for Restoration and Natural Resource Damage Assessment of Contaminated Sites: The Case of the Department of Energy

机译:确定受污染场地的恢复和自然资源损害评估的生态基线:以能源部为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Retrospective ecological risk assessment, restoration, natural resource damage assessment (NRDA) and managing ecosystems all require having a baseline. This policy and practice paper explores the factors that influence baseline selection, and it is suggested that ecological resources would best be served by: (1) integrating NRDA considerations into both future land-use planning and remediation/restoration; (2) selecting a baseline for NRDA that approximates the land-use conditions at the time of occupation (or a preferred ecosystem); and (3) integrating both the positive and negative aspects of industrial occupation into restoration decisions, baseline selection and NRDA. Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response and Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), natural resource damages are assessed for injuries incurred since 1980 due to releases, but the release itself may have occurred before 1980. The paper uses the Department of Energy as a case study to examine NRDA and the management of ecosystems. Releases occurred at many DOE sites from the 1950s to the 1980s during nuclear bomb production. It is suggested that the DOE has been responsible not only for injuries to natural resources that occurred as a result of releases, but for significant ecosystem recovery since DOE occupation, because some lands were previously farmed or industrialized. Natural resource injuries due to releases occurred simultaneously with ecosystem recovery that resulted from DOE occupation., While the 1980 date is codified in CERCLA law as the time after which damages can be assessed, baseline can be defined as the conditions the natural resources would have been in today, but for the release of the hazardous substance. It is also suggested that NRDA considerations should be incorporated into the remediation and restoration process at DOE sites, thereby negating the need for formal NRDA following restoration, and reducing the final NRDA costs.
机译:回顾性生态风险评估,恢复,自然资源破坏评估(NRDA)和生态系统管理都需要有基准。该政策和实践文件探讨了影响基线选择的因素,并建议最好通过以下方式为生态资源服务:(1)将NRDA的考虑因素纳入未来的土地使用规划和修复/恢复中; (2)为NRDA选择一个基线,该基线近似于占领时(或首选生态系统)的土地使用条件; (3)将工业职业的积极和消极方面都纳入恢复决策,基准选择和自然资源吸收评估。根据《综合环境响应,补偿和赔偿责任法》(CERCLA),对自1980年以来由于释放造成的伤害进行了自然资源损害评估,但这种释放本身可能发生在1980年之前。本文使用能源部作为案例研究检查NRDA和生态系统管理。从1950年代到1980年代,在核能生产期间,许多DOE站点都有释放。有人建议,能源部不仅要对由于排放造成的自然资源损害负责,而且还要对能源部自占领以来的大量生态系统恢复负责,因为某些土地以前是被耕种或工业化的。由于排放而造成的自然资源损害与DOE占领导致的生态系统恢复同时发生。虽然CERCLA法律将1980年的日期定义为可以评估损害的时间,但基线可以定义为自然资源的评估条件在今天,但用于释放有害物质。还建议将NRDA的考虑因素纳入DOE站点的修复和恢复过程,从而消除恢复后对正式NRDA的需求,并降低最终NRDA成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号