首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Engineering >Disposal of Arsenic-Laden Adsorptive Media: Economic Analysis for California
【24h】

Disposal of Arsenic-Laden Adsorptive Media: Economic Analysis for California

机译:含砷吸附介质的处置:加利福尼亚州的经济分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Due to California's stringent hazardous waste (HW) classification regulations, high-capacity adsorptive media (AM) used for the removal of arsenic from potable water are likely to be classified as HW if operated to breakthrough. An alternative is to prematurely retire the AM, avoiding generation of HW. The impact of waste classification of spent AM on annual costs for arsenic systems was investigated. For a typical small water system (SWS), the media replacement cost alone was predicted to range from $0.80 to $2.00 per 1,000 L treated, in comparison to the average cost of tap water in the U.S. of $0.53 per 1,000 L treated, highlighting the financial burden for SWS. The costs of media replacement dominated over costs for transport and disposal regardless of whether spent media were designated as HW or non-HW. Media costs and influent arsenic concentration were more significant factors than transport distance or disposal fees. Under typical conditions for SWS, it was found to be cost effective to load the media to exhaustion as long as the arsenic loading at replacement was greater than 560-mg arsenic/kg AM, a situation readily obtained with commercially available high-capacity iron oxide adsorbents.
机译:由于加利福尼亚州严格的危险废物(HW)分类法规,用于突破饮用水的用于去除饮用水中砷的高容量吸附介质(AM)可能会被归类为HW。另一种选择是提前退出AM,避免生成HW。调查了废旧AM的废物分类对砷系统年成本的影响。对于典型的小型自来水系统(SWS),仅介质更换成本就预计为每1000升0.80美元至2.00美元,而美国的自来水平均成本为每1000升0.53美元,这突出了财务速帝世界总冠军的重担。不管是将废旧媒体指定为硬件还是非硬件,介质更换的成本都高于运输和处置成本。介质成本和进水砷浓度比运输距离或处置费更为重要。在SWS的典型条件下,只要更换时砷的负载量大于560 mg砷/ kg AM,将介质负载到耗尽是经济有效的,这种情况很容易用市售高容量氧化铁获得。吸附剂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号