...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology >An enterprise based decision support system for engineering aggregate selection: a case study
【24h】

An enterprise based decision support system for engineering aggregate selection: a case study

机译:基于企业的工程骨料选择决策支持系统:案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to develop a framework that would help manufacturers to select the design concept that provides optimal solutions to the entire value chain involving multiple functional teams such as product design, development, planning, sourcing, service and marketing. The selection of an optimal design concept is based on the highest value index of a design concept. This is derived from quality function deployment (QFD) and a functional analysis system using customer requirement, quality deployment, development and design constraint as inputs. The framework systematically considers different alternatives to converge at an optimal solution. Design/methodology/approach - All high-level product requirements from customer and market analysis are translated into different engineering parameters using QFD. Thereafter, the functional analysis system technique (FAST) is employed to determine the range of functions and identify components that would achieve different functionalities. The relative importance of each function is determined by functional cost analyses, enabling us to generate different design concepts. Thereafter, business parameters are extracted from the business objective of each functional area. These business parameters are compared with different design concepts using the analytical hierarchical process (AHP), thus evolving the enterprise value index (EVI) for each design concept. Findings - The design concepts are evaluated with different business parameters using the AHP methodology to form EVI. The design concept 2 with highest enterprise EVI (4.549) is selected for further development. To validate the consistency of the business parameters, the consistency ratio (CR) has been calculated using Saaty's Eigenvector method. The value of CR is 8.4 per cent, which indicates that the judgment made in this paper as far as populating the business parameters weight matrix is concerned is quite reasonable. This framework would enable an enterprise's dealing in the area of complex engineering systems/aggregates to choose the design concept that would maximize the value of the enterprise. Originality/value - This research develops an integrated methodology for design concept selection from an enterprise point of view. Major functional agencies and their respective attributes are considered for the development of the framework and subsequent selection. An enterprise's mission and vision framework function as the primary input for the extraction of related attributes of the functional agency.
机译:目的-本文的目的是开发一个框架,以帮助制造商选择设计概念,从而为涉及多个职能团队(例如产品设计,开发,计划,采购,服务和营销)的整个价值链提供最佳解决方案。最佳设计概念的选择基于设计概念的最高价值指标。这源自质量功能部署(QFD)和功能分析系统,该系统使用客户需求,质量部署,开发和设计约束作为输入。该框架系统地考虑了不同的替代方案,以实现最佳解决方案的融合。设计/方法/方法-使用QFD将来自客户和市场分析的所有高级产品需求转换为不同的工程参数。此后,功能分析系统技术(FAST)用于确定功能范围并标识将实现不同功能的组件。每个功能的相对重要性由功能成本分析确定,使我们能够生成不同的设计概念。此后,从每个功能区域的业务目标中提取业务参数。使用层次分析层次分析(AHP)将这些业务参数与不同的设计概念进行比较,从而为每个设计概念发展企业价值指数(EVI)。发现-使用AHP方法以不同的业务参数评估设计概念以形成EVI。选择具有最高企业EVI(4.549)的设计概念2进行进一步开发。为了验证业务参数的一致性,已使用Saaty的特征向量法计算了一致性比率(CR)。 CR的值为8.4%,这表明就填充业务参数权重矩阵而言,本文所做的判断是相当合理的。该框架将使企业在复杂的工程系统/集合体领域中进行交易时可以选择将企业价值最大化的设计理念。原创性/价值-这项研究从企业的角度开发了一种用于设计概念选择的集成方法。主要职能机构及其各自的属性被考虑用于框架的开发和随后的选择。企业的使命和愿景框架是提取职能机构相关属性的主要输入。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号