首页> 外文期刊>Clinical therapeutics >Prospective, randomized, single-blind comparison of effects of 6 months of treatment with telmisartan versus enalapril on high-molecular-weight adiponectin concentrations in patients with coronary artery disease.
【24h】

Prospective, randomized, single-blind comparison of effects of 6 months of treatment with telmisartan versus enalapril on high-molecular-weight adiponectin concentrations in patients with coronary artery disease.

机译:替米沙坦与依那普利治疗6个月对冠心病患者高脂联素浓度的影响进行的前瞻性,随机,单盲比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: High-molecular-weight (HMW) adiponectin has important antiatherosclerotic properties. OBJECTIVES: This study compared circulating HMW adiponectin concentrations and other parameters between patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and participants without CAD. We investigated whether treatment with statins and either telmisartan or enalapril might affect HMW adiponectin and other parameters in patients with CAD. Finally, adiponectin concentrations were compared after 6 months of treatment between CAD patients with versus without cardiac events. METHODS: Consecutive patients with stable CAD admitted to our hospital (Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Iwate, Japan) for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and stent implantation and with no previous treatment with renin-angiotensin system blockers or statins were recruited. Patients with CAD who met all eligibility criteria were randomly assigned using computer-generated numbers in a 1:1 ratio to receive telmisartan (40 mg/d) or enalapril (5 mg/d) for 6 months. In addition, all patients with CAD were treated with atorvastatin (10 mg/d). The patients without CAD received no treatment with telmisartan, enalapril, or atorvastatin. Plasma concentrations of total and HMW adiponectin were measured using a highly sensitive ELISA system before PCI or drug treatment (ie, baseline) and after 6 months of treatment. In addition, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) were measured. To evaluate cardiac events, follow-up coronary angiography was performed at least 6 months after PCI. RESULTS: This study included 70 patients with stable CAD (mean [SD] age, 65.8 [10.9] years; male/female ratio, 55/15) and 25 participants with normal results on coronary angiography (non-CAD) (mean age, 63.5 [11.2] years; male/female ratio, 20/5). Baseline concentrations (mean [SD]) of HMW adiponectin were significantly lower in the CAD group than in the non-CAD group (2.0 [0.3] vs 9.2 [0.5] microg/mL; P < 0.01). The ratio of HMW to total adiponectin was also lower in the CAD group than in the non-CAD group (0.37 [0.02] vs 0.53 [0.02]; P < 0.01). Baseline concentrations of HMW adiponectin were negatively correlated with hs-CRP (r = -0.60) and HOMA-IR (r = -0.30) in patients with CAD. After 6 months of treatment, the telmisartan group showed significantly increased HMW adiponectin concentrations and HMW/total adiponectin ratio (HMW, 3.7 [0.7] vs 2.1 [0.5] microg/mL; P < 0.01 vs baseline; HMW/total, 0.44 [0.02] vs 0.39 [0.02]; P < 0.05 vs baseline), whereas HOMA-IR was significantly decreased (2.86 [1.93] vs 3.39 [1.77]; P < 0.05 vs baseline). HOMA-IR at follow-up was significantly lower in the telmisartan group than in the enalapril group (2.86 [1.93] vs 3.64 [1.45]; P < 0.05). In contrast, treatment with enalapril was not associated with any significant changes in total or HMW adiponectin concentrations, HMW/total adiponectin ratio, or HOMA-IR. Both the telmisartan and the enalapril groups showed significant decreases in hs-CRP after 6 months (P < 0.05 vs baseline). After 6 months of treatment with either telmisartan or enalapril, HMW adiponectin concentrations were 0.7 (0.2) microg/mL with cardiac events versus 3.2 (0.4) microg/mL without (P < 0.05); HMW/total concentrations were 0.25 (0.03) with cardiac events versus 0.43 (0.01) without (P < 0.01). In contrast, hs-CRP concentrations were higher in patients with cardiac events than in those without cardiac events (2.42 [0.52] vs 1.86 [0.45] log10 microg/dL; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: This study found that treatment with telmisartan and statins (but not enalapril and statins) was associated with a significant increase in HMW adiponectin concentrations and a decrease in insulin resistance in these patients with CAD.
机译:背景:高分子量脂联素具有重要的抗动脉粥样硬化特性。目的:本研究比较了患有冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的患者和未患有CAD的参与者之间的循环HMW脂联素浓度和其他参数。我们调查了他汀类药物和替米沙坦或依那普利的治疗是否会影响CAD患者的HMW脂联素和其他参数。最后,比较了有或没有心脏事件的CAD患者在治疗6个月后的脂联素浓度。方法:招募连续住院的CAD稳定的患者,该患者入选了我院(日本岩手县岩手医科大学医学院)进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和支架植入术,并且之前未接受过肾素-血管紧张素系统阻滞剂或他汀类药物的治疗。使用计算机生成的数字按1:1比例将符合所有资格标准的CAD患者随机分配,以接受替米沙坦(40 mg / d)或依那普利(5 mg / d)接受6个月的治疗。此外,所有CAD患者均接受了阿托伐他汀(10毫克/天)治疗。没有CAD的患者未接受替米沙坦,依那普利或阿托伐他汀治疗。在PCI或药物治疗之前(即基线)和治疗6个月后,使用高灵敏度的ELISA系统测量血浆总浓度和HMW脂联素的浓度。此外,还测量了高敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)和胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)。为了评估心脏事件,在PCI后至少6个月进行了冠状动脉造影检查。结果:该研究包括70例CAD稳定的患者(平均[SD]年龄,65.8 [10.9]岁;男女比例为55/15),以及25例冠状动脉造影(非CAD)结果正常的患者(平均年龄, 63.5 [11.2]岁;男女比例为20/5)。 CAD组中HMW脂联素的基线浓度(平均值[SD])显着低于非CAD组(2.0 [0.3] vs 9.2 [0.5] microg / mL; P <0.01)。 CAD组中HMW与总脂联素的比率也低于非CAD组(0.37 [0.02]对0.53 [0.02]; P <0.01)。冠心病患者中HMW脂联素的基线浓度与hs-CRP(r = -0.60)和HOMA-IR(r = -0.30)呈负相关。治疗6个月后,替米沙坦组显示HMW脂联素浓度和HMW /总脂联素比值显着增加(HMW,3.7 [0.7] vs 2.1 [0.5] microg / mL; P <0.01 vs基线; HMW /总0.44 [0.02] ] vs. 0.39 [0.02];与基线相比,P <0.05),而HOMA-IR显着降低(2.86 [1.93]与3.39 [1.77]; P <0.05,相对基线)。替米沙坦组随访时的HOMA-IR显着低于依那普利组(2.86 [1.93] vs 3.64 [1.45]; P <0.05)。相反,依那普利治疗与总或HMW脂联素浓度,HMW /总脂联素之比或HOMA-IR的任何显着变化无关。替米沙坦和依那普利组在6个月后均显示hs-CRP显着下降(相对于基线,P <0.05)。用替米沙坦或依那普利治疗6个月后,有心脏事件的HMW脂联素浓度为0.7(0.2)microg / mL,无心脏事件时为3.2(0.4)microg / mL(P <0.05);有心脏事件的HMW /总浓度为0.25(0.03),无心脏事件时为0.43(0.01)(P <0.01)。相反,心脏事件患者的hs-CRP浓度高于无心脏事件的患者(2.42 [0.52]对1.86 [0.45] log10 microg / dL; P <0.01)。结论:这项研究发现,替米沙坦和他汀类药物(而不是依那普利和他汀类药物)治疗与这些CAD患者的HMW脂联素浓度显着增加和胰岛素抵抗降低有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号