首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Endodontics: Official Journal of American Association of Endodontists >The effect of various mixing and placement techniques on the compressive strength of mineral trioxide aggregate
【24h】

The effect of various mixing and placement techniques on the compressive strength of mineral trioxide aggregate

机译:各种混合和放置技术对三氧化二矿骨料抗压强度的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of various mixing techniques including mechanical and manual mixing as well as the effect of ultrasonic agitation during placement on the compressive strength of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA). Methods: Tooth-colored ProRoot MTA (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and white MTA Angelus (Angelus Solu??es Odontologicas, Londrina, Brazil) were used. One gram of each powder was mixed with a 0.34-g aliquot of distilled water. Specimens were mixed either by mechanical mixing of capsules for 30 seconds at 4,500 rpm or by a saturation technique and the application of a condensation pressure of 3.22 MPa for 1 minute. Half of the specimens were placed in stainless steel molds and agitated using indirect ultrasonic activation. All specimens were subjected to compressive strength testing after 4 days. Results: The compressive strength values of ProRoot MTA were significantly greater than those of MTA Angelus (P <.05). The highest compressive strength values were recorded from ProRoot MTA samples that were mixed mechanically and placed using ultrasonic activation (mean = 101.71 MPa), whereas the lowest values were recorded for MTA Angelus samples that were mixed manually and placed without ultrasonic activation (mean = 53.47 MPa). Ultrasonically agitated groups had higher compressive strength values (P < .001). The specimens mixed mechanically had higher compressive strength values than those mixed manually (P <.05). Conclusions: The compressive strength values of ProRoot MTA were significantly greater than those of MTA Angelus. Mechanical mixing enhanced the compressive strength of the material. Regardless of the mixing techniques applied, ultrasonic agitation improved the compressive strength of the material. ? 2013 American Association of Endodontists.
机译:简介:这项研究的目的是评估各种混合技术(包括机械混合和手动混合)的效果,以及放置期间超声搅拌对三氧化二矿物骨料(MTA)抗压强度的影响。方法:使用了牙齿色的ProRoot MTA(Dentsply Maillefer,瑞士Ballaigues)和白色MTA Angelus(Angelus Solu?es Odontologicas,Londrina,巴西)。将每克粉末1克与0.34克等分的蒸馏水混合。通过将胶囊在4,500 rpm下机械混合30秒或通过饱和技术并施加3.22 MPa的冷凝压力1分钟来混合样品。将一半样品放置在不锈钢模具中,并使用间接超声激活进行搅拌。 4天后对所有样品进行抗压强度测试。结果:ProRoot MTA的抗压强度值明显高于MTA Angelus(P <.05)。机械混合并使用超声活化放置的ProRoot MTA样品记录了最高抗压强度值(平均值= 101.71 MPa),而手动混合并未经超声活化放置的MTA Angelus样品记录了最低抗压强度值(平均值= 53.47) MPa)。超声搅拌组的抗压强度较高(P <.001)。机械混合的样品的抗压强度值高于手工混合的样品(P <.05)。结论:ProRoot MTA的抗压强度值明显大于MTA Angelus。机械混合提高了材料的抗压强度。无论采用何种混合技术,超声搅拌都能提高材料的抗压强度。 ? 2013美国牙医学院会员协会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号