首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Endodontics: Official Journal of American Association of Endodontists >Glide path preparation in s-shaped canals with rotary pathfinding nickel-titanium instruments
【24h】

Glide path preparation in s-shaped canals with rotary pathfinding nickel-titanium instruments

机译:使用旋转寻径镍钛仪器在S形运河中进行滑道准备

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Introduction: This study compared the incidence of deviation along S-shaped (double-curved) canals after glide path preparation with 2 nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary pathfinding instruments and hand K-files. Methods: S-shaped canals from 60 training blocks were filled with ink, and preinstrumentation images were obtained by using a stereomicroscope. Glide path preparation was performed by an endodontist who used hand stainless steel K-files (up to size 20), rotary NiTi PathFile instruments (up to size 19), or rotary NiTi Scout RaCe instruments (up to size 20). Postinstrumentation images were taken by using exactly the same conditions as for the preinstrumentation images, and both pictures were superimposed. Differences along the S-shaped canal for the mesial and distal aspects were measured to evaluate the occurrence of deviation. Results: Intragroup analysis showed that all instruments promoted some deviation in virtually all levels. Overall, regardless of the group, deviations were observed in the mesial wall at the canal terminus and at levels 4, 5, 6 and 7 mm and in the distal wall at levels 1, 2, and 3 mm. These levels corresponded to the inner walls of each curvature. Both rotary NiTi instruments performed significantly better than hand K-files at all levels (P <.05), except for PathFiles at the 0-mm level. ScoutRaCe instruments showed significantly better results than PathFiles at levels 0, 2, 3, 5, and 6 mm (P <.05). Conclusions: Findings suggest that rotary NiTi instruments are suitable for adequate glide path preparation because they promoted less deviation from the original canal anatomy when compared with hand-operated instruments. Of the 2 rotary pathfinding instruments, Scout RaCe showed an overall significantly better performance.
机译:简介:本研究比较了使用2台镍钛(NiTi)旋转寻径仪和手动K型锉刀在滑坡路径准备后沿S形(双曲线)运河发生偏离的发生率。方法:用墨水填充来自60个训练块的S形管,并使用体视显微镜获得仪器前的图像。滑行路径准备工作由使用手动不锈钢K型锉刀(最大20号),旋转NiTi PathFile器械(最大19号)或旋转NiTi Scout RaCe器械(最大20号)的牙髓医生进行。使用与仪表前图像完全相同的条件拍摄仪表后图像,并将两张图片叠加在一起。测量沿S形管的近中和远端的差异,以评估偏差的发生。结果:组内分析表明,所有仪器实际上在所有水平上均引起一定程度的偏差。总体而言,无论哪个组,在运河总站和4、5、6和7 mm处的近中壁以及在1、2和3 mm处的远端壁均观察到偏差。这些水平对应于每个曲率的内壁。两种旋转式NiTi仪器在所有级别上的表现都明显优于手工K锉(P <.05),但Path-Files在0毫米级别除外。 ScoutRaCe仪器在0、2、3、5和6毫米处显示出比PathFiles更好的结果(P <.05)。结论:研究结果表明旋转式NiTi器械适合于适当的滑行路径准备,因为与手动器械相比,它们可促进与原始根管解剖结构的偏差较小。在2台旋转寻路仪中,Scout RaCe表现出总体上明显更好的性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号