首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Endodontics: Official Journal of American Association of Endodontists >Surface tension comparison of four common root canal irrigants and two new irrigants containing antibiotic.
【24h】

Surface tension comparison of four common root canal irrigants and two new irrigants containing antibiotic.

机译:四种常见根管冲洗液和两种含抗生素的新型冲洗液的表面张力比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study is to compare the surface tension of four common endodontic irrigants: Moltendo EDTA 17%, Cetrexidin, Smear Clear, Sodium hypochlorite 5.25%, with the surface tension of MTAD and Tetraclean. Freshly produced MilliQ water was used as a reference. All measurements were performed following the Wilhelmy plate technique, using a Cahn DCA-322 Dynamic Contact Angle Analyzer at the temperature of 22 degrees C. MilliQ water, sodium hypochlorite 5.25%, and EDTA 17% had the highest surface tension, whereas those of Cetrexedin and Tetraclean has shown the lowest surface tension value. Both new irrigants, MTAD and Tetraclean, are capable of removing the smear layer. Thanks to their low surface tension, increasing the intimate contact of irrigant solutions with the dentinal walls, they may permit deeper penetration.
机译:本研究的目的是比较四种常见的牙髓冲洗剂的表面张力:Moltendo EDTA 17%,Cetrexidin,Smear Clear,次氯酸钠5.25%,以及MTAD和Tetraclean的表面张力。新鲜生产的MilliQ水用作参考。所有测量均遵循Wilhelmy平板技术,使用Cahn DCA-322动态接触角分析仪在22摄氏度的温度下进行。MilliQ水,次氯酸钠5.25%和EDTA 17%的表面张力最高,而Cetrexedin的表面张力最高Tetraclean的表面张力值最低。 MTAD和Tetraclean这两种新的冲洗剂都能够去除污点层。由于它们的低表面张力,增加了冲洗液与牙本质壁的紧密接触,它们可以允许更深的渗透。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号