首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Endodontics: Official Journal of American Association of Endodontists >Antibacterial activity of Propolis versus conventional endodontic disinfectants against Enterococcus faecalis in infected dentinal tubules.
【24h】

Antibacterial activity of Propolis versus conventional endodontic disinfectants against Enterococcus faecalis in infected dentinal tubules.

机译:蜂胶与常规牙髓消毒剂对感染的牙本质小管中粪便肠球菌的抗菌活性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

INTRODUCTION: The antibacterial activity against Enterococcus faecalis of 2 propolis samples was investigated in a dentin block model, and their effectiveness was compared with that of established endodontic disinfectants, chlorhexidine (CHX) and calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH)(2)]. METHODS: Standardized dentin blocks were infected with E. faecalis ATCC 29212. The root canal space was filled with one of the ethanolic extracts of propolis (Artvin or Tekirdag mix [TM]), CHX 2%, Ca(OH)(2), or ethanol or phosphate-buffered saline for control. Canal dentin was sampled after 1 or 7 days by using a standard-size bur. The dentinal shavings were vortexed vigorously in phosphate-buffered saline, and aliquots were cultured on tryptone soy agar plates. Colonies were counted after 2 days of incubation. Statistical significance was set to 5%. RESULTS: All experimental agents significantly reduced the number of the cultivable bacteria. CHX was the most potent disinfectant at both times. Compared with the ethanol control, no significant reduction in the number of colonies was found for the propolis extracts at day 1; however, significant reduction was found at day 7. The 2 propolis samples were statistically similar to each other and to Ca(OH)(2), but the TM sample was also similar to CHX at day 7. This has been linked to the greater concentration of flavonoids, a group of antibacterially active compounds, in the TM sample as determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The antimicrobial activity of the propolis samples tested in this study was between Ca(OH)(2) and CHX. Both propolis samples were antimicrobially effective; however, their activity did not exceed CHX.
机译:简介:在牙本质阻断模型中研究了两种蜂胶样品对粪肠球菌的抗菌活性,并将其与已建立的牙髓消毒剂,洗必泰(CHX)和氢氧化钙[Ca(OH)(2)]的功效进行了比较。方法:用粪肠球菌ATCC 29212感染标准化的牙本质块。根管间隙充满蜂胶的一种乙醇提取物(Artvin或Tekirdag mix [TM]),CHX 2%,Ca(OH)(2),或乙醇或磷酸盐缓冲盐水进行控制。 1或7天后,使用标准尺寸的牙钻对牙本质进行采样。在磷酸盐缓冲液中剧烈涡旋牙齿的切屑,并在胰蛋白tone大豆琼脂平板上培养等分试样。培养2天后对菌落计数。统计显着性设为5%。结果:所有实验剂均显着减少了可培养细菌的数量。 CHX两次都是最有效的消毒剂。与乙醇对照相比,蜂胶提取物在第1天的集落数没有显着减少;但是,在第7天发现明显减少。2个蜂胶样品在统计学上彼此相似,并且与Ca(OH)(2)相似,但是TM样品在第7天也与CHX相似。气相色谱-质谱分析法测定TM样品中黄酮类化合物(一组抗菌活性化合物)的浓度。结论:本研究中测试的蜂胶样品的抗菌活性介于Ca(OH)(2)和CHX之间。两种蜂胶样品均具有抗菌作用。但是,他们的活动没有超过CHX。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号