首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endovascular therapy: an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists >Quality of life after balloon angioplasty versus stent implantation in the superficial femoral artery: findings from a randomized controlled trial.
【24h】

Quality of life after balloon angioplasty versus stent implantation in the superficial femoral artery: findings from a randomized controlled trial.

机译:球囊成形术与股浅动脉支架植入术后的生活质量:一项随机对照试验的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To investigate whether primary nitinol stenting in the superficial femoral artery (SFA) is beneficial to patients' quality of life (QoL). METHODS: One hundred four patients (55 men; mean age 66+/-19 years) with chronic limb ischemia and SFA disease were randomly assigned to primary stent implantation (n=51) or balloon angioplasty (n=53) with optional stenting for a suboptimal angioplasty result (17 of 53). QoL was measured by the SF-36 questionnaire at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months post intervention. RESULTS: QoL was significantly improved post intervention and up to 12 months in both treatment groups. Significant inverse associations were observed between QoL parameters and restenosis. Comparing primary stenting (n=51) versus balloon angioplasty with optional stenting (n=53) by the intention to treat, no significant differences in QoL were observed. Analyses of stented patients (n=68) versus balloon angioplasty (n=36) patients, however, demonstrated significantly improved measures of QoL after stenting. CONCLUSION: Endovascular revascularization of SFA disease improves QoL, and restenosis negatively affects QoL outcomes. After stent implantation, whether primary or secondary, QoL was significantly ameliorated compared to balloon angioplasty alone. However, it remains to be proven in larger cohorts whether primary stenting yields a QoL benefit compared to balloon angioplasty with optional secondary stenting.
机译:目的:探讨在股浅动脉(SFA)进行一次镍钛合金支架置入对患者的生活质量(QoL)是否有益。方法:144例慢性肢体缺血和SFA病患(55名男性,平均年龄66 +/- 19岁)被随机分配至主要支架植入术(n = 51)或球囊血管成形术(n = 53),并可选用支架植入术。次佳的血管成形术结果(53个中的17个)。基线和干预后3、6和12个月通过SF-36问卷测量QoL。结果:两个治疗组的干预后和长达12个月的生活质量均得到显着改善。 QoL参数与再狭窄之间存在显着的负相关。通过治疗目的比较主要支架置入术(n = 51)与球囊血管成形术与可选支架置入术(n = 53)的比较,未观察到QoL的显着差异。但是,对支架置入患者(n = 68)和球囊血管成形术(n = 36)患者的分析表明,支架置入后的QoL指标得到了显着改善。结论:SFA疾病的血管内血运重建可改善QoL,而再狭窄会对QoL结局产生负面影响。与单独的球囊血管成形术相比,无论是原发还是继发支架植入术后,QoL均得到明显改善。然而,与采用可选的二次支架的球囊血管成形术相比,一次支架置入是否能够产生QoL益处尚待在更大的队列研究中得到证实。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号