首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endourology >NTrap in prevention of stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy for proximal ureteral stones: A meta-analysis
【24h】

NTrap in prevention of stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy for proximal ureteral stones: A meta-analysis

机译:NTrap预防输尿管镜碎石术治疗近端输尿管结石时结石迁移:Meta分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of NTrap in the prevention of stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy for proximal ureteral stones. Methods: Eligible studies were identified from electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, ISI -Science Citation Index, and Chinese biomedicine literature database). The database search, quality assessment, and data extraction were independently performed by two reviewers. Our primary outcomes were the stone-free (SF) and incidence of stone migration. Secondary outcomes were operative time and the rate of auxiliary procedures. The outcomes were explored by using Review Manager 5.0. Sensitivity analysis was performed to explore the influence of low-quality studies. Results: Two randomized controlled trials and one case-control study including 456 patients met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of extractable data showed that patients who underwent ureteroscopic lithotripsy with the use of the NTrap demonstrated a significant advantage over without the use of the NTrap in terms of the stone-free rate (odds ratio [OR]=3.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.45-6.53], P=0.003); the incidence of stone migration was significantly lower in NTrap treatment than without NTrap (OR=0.23, 95% CI: 0.10-0.53, P=0.0006, while there was no significant difference in operative time between NTrap and control (mean difference=-3.25, 95% CI: -16.11-9.62, P=0.62). Our pooled meta-analysis showed that the incidence of auxiliary shockwave lithotripsy was significantly lower in NTrap treatment than control (OR=0.29, 95% CI: 0.12-0.70, P=0.006). Conclusion: The results of this meta-analysis suggested that the NTrap stone occlusion device is efficient at preventing stone retropulsion during ureteroscopic lithotripsy of proximal ureteral calculi. The findings of this review highlight the need for more efficient performance of higher quality, more rigorous, large sample, long-term randomized controlled trials where outcomes are detailed in description.
机译:目的:评价NTrap预防输尿管镜碎石术中输尿管近端结石的结石迁移的有效性。方法:从电子数据库(PubMed,Embase,Cochrane图书馆,ISI-科学引文索引和中国生物医学文献数据库)中鉴定合格的研究。数据库搜索,质量评估和数据提取由两名审阅者独立执行。我们的主要结果是无结石(SF)和结石迁移的发生率。次要结果是手术时间和辅助手术率。通过使用Review Manager 5.0探索结果。进行敏感性分析以探索低质量研究的影响。结果:两项随机对照试验和一项病例对照研究(包括456位患者)符合纳入标准。对可提取数据的荟萃分析显示,与不使用NTrap相比,使用NTrap进行输尿管镜碎石术的患者在无结石率方面具有显着优势(优势比[OR] = 3.08,置信度为95%)间隔[CI] [1.45-6.53],P = 0.003); NTrap治疗的结石迁移发生率显着低于未使用NTrap的患者(OR = 0.23,95%CI:0.10-0.53,P = 0.0006,而NTrap与对照组的手术时间无显着差异(平均差异= -3.25 ,95%CI:-16.11-9.62,P = 0.62。我们的汇总荟萃分析显示,NTrap治疗中辅助冲击波碎石的发生率显着低于对照组(OR = 0.29,95%CI:0.12-0.70,P = 0.006)。结论:这项荟萃分析的结果表明,NTrap结石咬合装置可有效防止输尿管近端结石的输尿管镜碎石术中的结石逆行,该评价的结果凸显了需要更高效,更高效的表现,更严格,大样本,长期随机对照试验,其中详细描述了结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号