...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economic Entomology >Comparison of arboreal beetle catches in wet and dry collection cups with Lindgren multiple funnel traps
【24h】

Comparison of arboreal beetle catches in wet and dry collection cups with Lindgren multiple funnel traps

机译:使用Lindgren多个漏斗对干式和干式收集杯中的甲虫甲虫进行比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We compared the effectiveness of a dry collection cup (with an insecticide killing strip) to a wet collection cup (containing antifreeze) for use with Lindgren multiple-funnel traps in catching several common species of bark and wood-boring beetles, and their associates in southern pine forests. All traps were baited with either the binary combination of ethanol and (-)-alpha-pinene or the quaternary combination of (+/-)-ipsenol, (+/-)-ipsdienol, ethanol, and (-)-alpha-pinene. We found that cup treatment had little, if any, effect on catches of Ips avulsus (Eichhoff) and L grandicollis (Eichhoff) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), Alaus myops (F.) (Elateridae), Chalcophora Solier species (Buprestidae), Temnochila virescens (F.) (Trogositidae), and Lasconotus Erichson species (Colydiidae). In contrast, catches of the following species were significantly less (by 40 - 97%) in traps with dry cups than in traps with wet cups: Hylobius pales Herbst and Pachylobius picivorus LeConte (Curculionidae); Buprestis lineata F. (Buprestidae); Acanthocinus obsoletus (Olivier), Arhopalus rusticus nubilus (LeConte), Monochamus titillator (F.) and Xylotrechus sagittatus sagittatus (Cerambycidae); Hylastes porculus Erichson and Xyleborinus saxeseni (Ratzeburg) (Scolytidae); and Thanasimus dubius (F.) (Cleridae). The same was true in at least one experiment for the following species: Dendroctonus terebrans (Olivier), Hylastes salebrosus Eichhoff, Hylastes tenuis Eichhoff, and Xylosandrus crassiusculus (Motschulsky) (Scolytidae). We conclude that cup treatment can have a significant impact on catches of some arboreal beetles in baited multiple-funnel traps. Anyone using multiple-funnel traps to capture arboreal beetles should evaluate the potential impacts arising from their choice of collection cup treatment to their trapping objectives and expectations. The issue of cup treatment may be particular important at low population levels when maximum trap efficiency is required such as in the detection of exotic insects at ports-of-entry and within quarantine and containment zones.
机译:我们将干式收集杯(带有杀虫剂条)与湿式收集杯(包含防冻剂)的效果进行了比较,后者与Lindgren多漏斗陷阱一起用于捕获几种常见的树皮和枯木甲虫及其同伴南部的松树林。所有诱捕器均以乙醇和(-)-α-pine烯的二元组合或(+/-)-艾酚,(+/-)-ipsdienol,乙醇和(-)-α-pine烯的四元组合诱饵。我们发现,杯具处理对金针菇(Eichhoff)和大叶蝉(Eichhoff)(鞘翅目:鞘翅目),Alaus短尾目(F.)(Elateridae),Chalcophora Solier种(Buprestidae),Temnochila的捕获几乎没有影响。 virescens(F.)(Trogositidae)和Lasconotus Erichson种(Colydiidae)。相比之下,干杯诱捕器中以下物种的捕获量要比湿杯诱捕器中的捕获率要低得多(40%-97%):苍白Hylobius苍蝇Herbst和Pachylobius picivorus LeConte(Curculionidae); Buprestis lineata F.(Buprestidae); Acanthocinus obsoletus(Olivier),Arhopalus Rustus nubilus(LeConte),Monochamus titillator(F.)和Xylotrechus sagittatus sagittatus(Cerambycidae); Hypores porculus Erichson和Xyleborinus saxeseni(Ratzeburg)(Scolytidae);和Thanasimus dubius(F.)(科)。在以下物种的至少一个实验中也是如此:Dendroctonus terebrans(Olivier),Hylastes salebrosus Eichhoff,Hylastes tenuis Eichhoff和Xylosandrus crassiusculus(Motschulsky)(Scolytidae)。我们得出的结论是,杯具处理对诱饵式多漏斗诱集器中某些树栖甲虫的捕获有重要影响。任何使用多漏斗收集器捕获树栖甲虫的人都应评估选择收集杯处理方式对其捕获目标和期望产生的潜在影响。当需要最大的捕集效率时,例如在进入口以及检疫和收容区内的外来昆虫的检测中,杯子处理问题在低种群水平下尤其重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号