首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economic Entomology >Comparison of Relative Bias, Precision, and Efficiency of Sampling Methods for Natural Enemies of Soybean Aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae)
【24h】

Comparison of Relative Bias, Precision, and Efficiency of Sampling Methods for Natural Enemies of Soybean Aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae)

机译:大豆蚜虫天敌相对偏倚,精密度和采样方法效率的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Generalist natural enemies play an important role in controlling soybean aphid, Aphis glycines (Hemiptera: Aphididae), in North America. Several sampling methods are used to monitor natural enemy populations in soybean, but there has been little work investigating their relative bias, precision, and efficiency. We compare five sampling methods: quadrats, whole-plant counts, sweep-netting, walking transects, and yellow sticky cards to determine the most practical methods for sampling the three most prominent species, which included Harmonia axyridis (Pallas), Coccinella septempunctata L. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), and Orius insidiosus (Say) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). We show an important time by sampling method interaction indicated by diverging community similarities within and between sampling methods as the growing season progressed. Similarly, correlations between sampling methods for the three most abundant species over multiple time periods indicated differences in relative bias between sampling methods and suggests that bias is not consistent throughout the growing season, particularly for sticky cards and whole-plant samples. Furthermore, we show that sticky cards produce strongly biased capture rates relative to the other four sampling methods. Precision and efficiency differed between sampling methods and sticky cards produced the most precise (but highly biased) results for adult natural enemies, while walking transects and whole-plant counts were the most efficient methods for detecting coccinellids and O. insidiosus, respectively. Based on bias, precision, and efficiency considerations, the most practical sampling methods for monitoring in soybean include walking transects for coccinellid detection and whole-plant counts for detection of small predators like O. insidiosus. Sweep-netting and quadrat samples are also useful for some applications, when efficiency is not paramount.
机译:通才的天敌在控制北美大豆蚜虫蚜虫甘氨酸(半翅目:蚜虫)中起着重要作用。几种采样方法用于监测大豆中的天敌种群,但很少有研究它们的相对偏差,精确度和效率的工作。我们比较了五种采样方法:四边形,整株植物计数,扫网,步行样带和黄色粘卡,以确定对三种最重要物种进行采样的最实用方法,其中包括异色和谐木(Pallas),七星瓢虫(Coccinella septempunctata L)。 (鞘翅目:球虫科),和Orius insidiosus(说)(半翅目:Anthocoridae)。我们通过采样方法的相互作用显示了一个重要的时间,随着生长期的发展,采样方法之间和不同采样方法之间的社区相似性表明了这一点。同样,在多个时间段内对三种最丰富物种的采样方法之间的相关性表明,采样方法之间的相对偏差有所不同,这表明在整个生长季节,尤其是对于粘性卡片和整株植物样品,偏差并非始终一致。此外,我们表明,相对于其他四种采样方法,粘性卡产生的捕获率存在严重偏差。精度和效率在采样方法之间有所不同,对于成人天敌,粘性卡产生的结果最精确(但偏差很大),而步行样带和整株植物的计数分别是检测球虫和印度梧桐的最有效方法。基于偏差,精度和效率方面的考虑,用于大豆监测的最实用的采样方法包括步行横断面用于球虫检测以及整株植物计数以用于检测小食肉动物(如O. insidiosus)。当效率不是最重要的时候,扫频采样和正交采样对于某些应用也很有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号