...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics >Non-local gravity and comparison with observational datasets. II. Updated results and Bayesian model comparison with Lambda CDM
【24h】

Non-local gravity and comparison with observational datasets. II. Updated results and Bayesian model comparison with Lambda CDM

机译:非局部重力并与观测数据集进行比较。二。使用Lambda CDM更新结果并进行贝叶斯模型比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We present a comprehensive and updated comparison with cosmological observations of two non-local modifications of gravity previously introduced by our group, the so called RR and RT models. We implement the background evolution and the cosmological perturbations of the models in a modified Boltzmann code, using CLASS. We then test the non-local models against the Planck 2015 TT, TE, EE and Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) lensing data, isotropic and anisotropic Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) data, JLA supernovae, H-0 measurements and growth rate data, and we perform Bayesian parameter estimation. We then compare the RR, RT and ACDM models, using the Savage-Dickey method. We find that the RT model and ACDM perform equally well, while the performance of the RR model with respect to ACDM depends on whether or not we include a prior on Ho based on local measurements.
机译:我们提出了与宇宙学观测的全面和最新的比较,这是我们小组先前引入的两种非局部引力变化的理论,即所谓的RR和RT模型。我们使用CLASS在修改的Boltzmann代码中实现了模型的背景演变和宇宙扰动。然后,我们针对Planck 2015 TT,TE,EE和宇宙微波背景(CMB)透镜数据,各向同性和各向异性的重子声振荡(BAO)数据,JLA超新星,H-0测量值和增长率数据,对非本地模型进行测试,然后执行贝叶斯参数估计。然后,我们使用Savage-Dickey方法比较RR,RT和ACDM模型。我们发现RT模型和ACDM的性能相当好,而RR模型相对于ACDM的性能取决于我们是否基于本地测量结果包含先验的Ho。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号