...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dentistry >In vitro evaluation of bonding effectiveness to dentin of all-in-one adhesives.
【24h】

In vitro evaluation of bonding effectiveness to dentin of all-in-one adhesives.

机译:多合一胶粘剂与牙本质粘合效果的体外评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: The study was aimed at assessing the bonding potential of all-in-one adhesives to dentin. METHODS: The microtensile bond strength of the all-in-one adhesives Bond Force (Tokuyama), AdheSE One (Ivoclar-Vivadent), and Xeno V (Dentsply) was measured in comparison with the etch-and-rinse system XP Bond (Dentsply). The ultrastructural characteristics of dentin-adhesive interface were observed under scanning electron microscope (SEM). Twenty human extracted third molars had their mid-coronal dentin exposed and ground with wet 600-grit SiC paper in order to create a standardized smear layer. Bonding procedures were performed according to the manufacturers' instructions and microtensile beams were obtained with the "non-trimming" technique. The bond strengths in MPa were statistically analyzed including pre-test failures as "zero" values (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Levene's test, One-Way ANOVA, Tukey's test p<0.05). RESULTS: The following bond strengths were recorded in MPa (mean+/-standard deviation): AdheSE One 31.7+/-21.3; Xeno V 42.8+/-26.4; Bond Force 43.3+/-22.1; XP Bond 51.9+/-18.6. The statistical analysis demonstrated that the bond strengths achieved by Bond Force and Xeno V were similar to that of the etch-and-rinse adhesive, whereas the bond strength of AdheSE One was significantly lower. A distinct hybrid layer with resin tags was seen only in XP Bond specimens. All-in-one adhesives demonstrated a rather superficial interaction with the dentin substrate. CONCLUSIONS: Although the strongest bond to dentin was established by the etch-and-rinse system, however the all-in-one adhesives containing organic solvents reached bond strength levels that were comparable from a statistical point of view.
机译:目的:该研究旨在评估多合一粘合剂与牙本质的粘合潜力。方法:与蚀刻和冲洗系统XP Bond(Dentsply)相比,测量了多合一粘合剂Bond Force(Tokuyama),AdheSE One(Ivoclar-Vivadent)和Xeno V(Dentsply)的微拉伸粘合强度。 )。在扫描电子显微镜(SEM)下观察牙本质-胶粘剂界面的超微结构特征。将二十个人提取的第三磨牙暴露于其中冠状牙本质,并用湿润的600砂砾SiC纸研磨,以形成标准化的涂片层。根据制造商的说明执行粘合程序,并使用“非修边”技术获得微张力束。统计分析了以MPa为单位的粘结强度,包括测试前的失败(作为“零”值)(Kolmogorov-Smirnov测试,Levene测试,单向方差分析,Tukey测试p <0.05)。结果:记录了以下结合强度,单位为MPa(平均值+/-标准偏差):AdheSE One 31.7 +/- 21.3; Xeno V 42.8 +/- 26.4;结合力43.3 +/- 22.1; XP粘结力51.9 +/- 18.6。统计分析表明,Bond Force和Xeno V的粘合强度与蚀刻和冲洗粘合剂的粘合强度相似,而AdheSE One的粘合强度则明显较低。仅在XP Bond标本中才能看到带有树脂标签的独特混合层。多合一粘合剂表现出与牙本质基质相当浅的相互作用。结论:尽管通过蚀刻和冲洗系统建立了与牙本质的最牢固结合,但是从统计学的角度来看,包含有机溶剂的多合一粘合剂达到了可比的结合强度水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号