首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dentistry >An in vitro investigation of microtensile bond strengths of two dentine adhesives to caries-affected dentine.
【24h】

An in vitro investigation of microtensile bond strengths of two dentine adhesives to caries-affected dentine.

机译:两种牙本质粘合剂对龋齿影响的牙本质的微拉伸粘合强度的体外研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To compare the micro-tensile bond strengths of two different adhesive systems (ABF (Clearfil Protect Bond), Kuraray Medical Inc., Tokyo, Japan) and Prime & Bond NT (PBNT, Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany) bonded to caries-affected dentine retained after chemo-mechanical caries removal using Carisolv gel, with that retained after excavation using conventional hand instrumentation. METHOD: Twenty, adult, human extracted carious teeth were used in this split tooth study with bur-cut cavities in sound dentine acting as controls. After clinical caries excavation, the occlusal cavities in each experimental group were restored with either bonding system plus composite. Matchstick-shaped samples through the bond interfaces were sectioned and microtensile bond strengths recorded. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to ascertain the mode of failure at the restoration-dentine interface. RESULTS: Statistical analysis of the bond strength data showed that for the ABF group, there was no difference inbond strengths between the controls and Carisolv group but these values were significantly higher than those for the hand-excavated samples. PBNT samples showed no significant differences in any of the three test groups, with wider ranging data sets. SEM analysis indicated a variety of failures at the interface including cohesive failures within the caries-affected dentine itself. CONCLUSIONS: From the data generated by this study it could be concluded that microtensile bond strengths of PBNT/composite restorations to caries-affected dentine in clinical cavities were statistically comparable to those to sound dentine. In the ABF/composite restored group (self-etched), the use of conventional hand excavation appeared to weaken the bond strength to the remaining caries-affected dentine. However, the use of Carisolv gel excavation did not compromise bond strengths to caries-affected dentine in either group tested.
机译:目的:比较两种不同的粘合剂系统(ABF(Clearfil Protect Bond),日本东京可乐丽医疗公司)和Prime&Bond NT(PBNT,Dentsply,德国康斯坦茨,德国)粘合到龋齿上的微拉伸强度,使用Carisolv凝胶去除化学机械龋齿后保留的牙本质,使用常规手动器械在挖掘后保留的牙本质。方法:在这项裂齿研究中,使用二十只成年人类提取的龋齿,并以健全的牙本质中的打孔腔作为对照。在临床龋齿开挖后,每个实验组的咬合腔均采用粘结系统加复合材料修复。将通过粘合界面的火柴形样品切开并记录微拉伸粘合强度。扫描电子显微镜(SEM)用于确定修复体与牙本质界面的破坏模式。结果:对粘结强度数据的统计分析表明,对于ABF组,对照组和Carisolv组之间的粘结强度没有差异,但这些值显着高于手工挖出的样品。 PBNT样本在三个测试组中的任何一个中均没有显示出显着差异,数据范围更广。 SEM分析表明界面处的各种故障,包括龋齿影响的牙本质本身内的内聚性故障。结论:根据这项研究产生的数据,可以得出结论,PBNT /复合修复体对龋齿影响的牙本质的微拉伸结合强度在统计学上可与声固性牙本质相比。在ABF /复合修复组(自蚀刻)中,使用常规手工开挖似乎会削弱与其余龋齿影响的牙本质的粘合强度。但是,在两个测试组中,使用Carisolv凝胶开挖均不会损害与龋齿影响的牙本质的结合强度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号