...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dentistry >Pull-out bond strength of a fibre-reinforced composite post system luted with self-adhesive resin cements
【24h】

Pull-out bond strength of a fibre-reinforced composite post system luted with self-adhesive resin cements

机译:纤维增强复合材料桩系统的自粘树脂胶粘剂的抗拉强度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives Due to morphological differences along the root canal, serious structural damage, or extensive endodontic preparation, cement thickness of luted fibre-reinforced composite (FRC) post systems can largely vary. This study aimed at evaluating the effects of a self-etch (Multilink Automix, MLA) and various self-adhesive resin cements (G-Cem, GCM; Maxcem Elite, MXE; RelyX Unicem, RLX; SmartCem 2, SMC) on the pull-out bond strengths of FRC posts to root canal dentine, and to compare the effects of different cementation thicknesses. Methods 100 bovine incisor roots were embedded in acrylic resin and randomly assigned to two groups. Root canals of group 1 were prepared with RelyX Fiber Post drill size one (? 1.3 mm), whereas in group 2 drill size three (? 1.9 mm) was used to attain different cement thicknesses (thicknesses 1 and 2). Each group was then subdivided into five subgroups (n = 10). RelyX Fiber Posts size one (? 0.70 mm) were luted with the respective resin cements. All specimens were subjected to pull-out evaluation using a universal testing machine. Post surface areas covered with cement were measured by means of stereomicroscopy. Results RLX revealed the significantly highest pull-out bond strengths in both groups (p < 0.05), while MXE exhibited the significantly lowest pull-out bond strengths in group 2 (p < 0.05). Main failure modes were determined as adhesive at the cement-post surface for all examined groups (except for SMC, group 2). Conclusions The different resin cements influenced the pull-out bond strengths, whereas the cement thickness itself was not responsible for any differences. Clinical significance Self-adhesive resin cements can provide an acceptable retention of FRC posts even in case of use with wider post space conditions.
机译:目的由于根管的形态差异,严重的结构损伤或广泛的牙髓准备,引诱的纤维增强复合材料(FRC)桩后系统的水泥厚度可能会有很大差异。这项研究旨在评估自蚀刻(Multilink Automix,MLA)和各种自粘树脂水泥(G-Cem,GCM; Maxcem Elite,MXE; RelyX Unicem,RLX; SmartCem 2,SMC)的影响。 FRC桩与根管牙本质的粘结强度,并比较不同胶结厚度的影响。方法将100根牛切牙根埋入丙烯酸树脂中,随机分为两组。第一组的根管用一号RelyX Fiber Post钻头准备(约1.3毫米),而在第二组中,三号钻头(约1.9毫米)用于获得不同的水泥厚度(厚度1和2)。然后将每个组细分为五个子组(n = 10)。用各自的树脂胶粘剂浸润尺寸为1(约0.70毫米)的RelyX纤维桩。使用通用测试机对所有样品进行拉拔评估。通过立体显微镜测量覆盖有水泥的柱的表面积。结果RLX显示两组均具有最高的拉拔结合强度(p <0.05),而MXE显示组2中具有最低的拉拔结合强度(p <0.05)。对于所有检查的组(SMC第2组除外),将主要破坏模式确定为水泥桩表面的粘合剂。结论不同的树脂胶粘剂会影响拉拔粘结强度,而胶粘剂厚度本身不构成任何差异。临床意义即使在较宽的柱子空间条件下使用,自粘树脂胶粘剂也可以提供可接受的FRC柱子固位力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号