...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dentistry >Combined effect of smear layer characteristics and hydrostatic pulpal pressure on dentine bond strength of HEMA-free and HEMA-containing adhesives
【24h】

Combined effect of smear layer characteristics and hydrostatic pulpal pressure on dentine bond strength of HEMA-free and HEMA-containing adhesives

机译:涂抹层特性和静水纸浆压力对无HEMA和含HEMA粘合剂的牙本质粘合强度的综合影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective This study evaluated the combined effect of smear layer characteristics with hydrostatic pulpal pressure (PP) on bond strength and nanoleakage expression of HEMA-free and -containing self-etch adhesives. Methods Flat dentine surfaces were obtained from extracted human molars. Smear layers were created by grinding with #180- or #600-SiC paper. Three HEMA-free adhesives (Xeno V, G Bond Plus, Beautibond Multi) and two HEMA-containing adhesives (Bond Force, Tri-S Bond) were applied to the dentine surfaces under hydrostatic PP or none. Dentine bond strengths were determined using the microtensile bond test (μTBS). Data were statistically analyzed using three- and two-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc comparison test. Nanoleakage evaluation was carried out under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results Coarse smear layer preparation and hydrostatic PP negatively affected the μTBS of HEMA-free and -containing adhesives, but there were no significant differences. The combined experimental condition significantly reduced μTBS of the HEMA-free adhesives, while the HEMA-containing adhesives exhibited no significant differences. Two-way ANOVA indicated that for HEMA-free adhesives, there were significant interactions in μTBS between smear layer characteristics and pulpal pressure, while for HEMA-containing adhesives, there were no significant interactions between them. Nanoleakage formation within the adhesive layers of both adhesive systems distinctly increased in the combined experimental group. Conclusion The combined effect of coarse smear layer preparation with hydrostatic PP significantly reduced the μTBS of HEMA-free adhesives, while in HEMA-containing adhesives, these effects were not obvious. Clinical significance Smear layer characteristics and hydrostatic PP would additively compromise dentine bonding of self-etch adhesives, especially HEMA-free adhesives.
机译:目的研究涂片层特性与静水纸浆压力(PP)对不含HEMA和含HEMA的自蚀刻胶粘剂的粘结强度和纳米渗漏表达的综合影响。方法从提取的人类臼齿获得平坦的牙本质表面。通过用#180-或#600-SiC纸研磨来创建涂片层。将三种不含HEMA的胶粘剂(Xeno V,G Bond Plus,Beautibond Multi)和两种含有HEMA的胶粘剂(Bond Force,Tri-S Bond)在静压PP或不施加静压的情况下施用于牙本质表面。使用微拉伸粘合力测试(μTBS)测定牙本质粘合强度。使用三向和两向方差分析与Tukey事后比较测试对数据进行统计分析。在扫描电子显微镜(SEM)下进行纳米泄漏评价。结果粗糙的涂片层制备和静水PP对无HEMA和含HEMA粘合剂的μTBS有负面影响,但没有显着差异。组合的实验条件显着降低了无HEMA粘合剂的μTBS,而含HEMA的粘合剂则没有显着差异。双向方差分析表明,对于不含HEMA的胶粘剂,涂片层特性与纸浆压力之间的μTBS有显着的相互作用,而对于含HEMA的胶粘剂,它们之间没有显着的相互作用。在组合的实验组中,两种粘合剂体系的粘合剂层内的纳米泄漏形成明显增加。结论粗糙涂抹层制备与静水PP的联合作用显着降低了无HEMA粘合剂的μTBS,而在含HEMA的粘合剂中,这些作用并不明显。临床意义涂污层特性和静水PP会附加地损害自蚀刻粘合剂(尤其是无HEMA粘合剂)的牙本质粘合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号