...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dentistry >A preliminary evaluation of the structural integrity and fracture mode of minimally prepared resin bonded CAD/CAM crowns.
【24h】

A preliminary evaluation of the structural integrity and fracture mode of minimally prepared resin bonded CAD/CAM crowns.

机译:最少准备的树脂粘结CAD / CAM牙冠的结构完整性和断裂模式的初步评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: This study was a preliminary evaluation of two minimal preparation designs proposed for ceramic and composite resin bonded CAD/CAM crowns. It compared the structural integrity and fracture mode of teeth restored with traditionally and minimally prepared resin bonded CAD/CAM crowns fabricated from the same material hypothesizing that teeth restored with minimal resin bonded crowns would demonstrate the same fracture strength to teeth restored with traditional resin bonded crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty intact maxillary molar teeth were used and divided in four groups. Two groups were prepared according to a traditional crown preparation design and two groups were prepared according to minimal preparation designs. A resin composite (Paradigm MZ100, 3M ESPE) and a leucite glass-ceramic (ProCAD, Ivoclar Vivadent) were used for the fabrication of the crowns using CEREC Scan. Crowns of ceramic were cemented using Variolink II (Ivoclar Vivadent) and crowns of composite with Rely X Unicem Aplicap (3M ESPE) and loaded until fracture. Load data was analysed using ANOVA comparing crowns of the same restorative material. The mode of fracture was also recorded and analysed (Kruskal-Wallis). RESULTS: For the composite system the mean fracture load and SD was 1682N (+/-315) for the traditional and 1751N (+/-338) for the minimal crowns. For the ceramic system the mean fracture load and SD was 1512N (+/-373) for the traditional and 1837 (+/-356) for the minimal crowns. No statistically significant difference was found between the two designs for each system. Nonparametric analysis (Kruskal-Wallis) of the fracture mode showed no statistical significant difference between designs for either material (p>.05). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this experimental design, it was found that minimally prepared resin bonded CEREC crowns demonstrated equal fracture resistance and mode of fracture to that of crowns bonded to traditionally prepared teeth.
机译:目的:本研究是对陶瓷和复合树脂粘结的CAD / CAM牙冠提出的两种最小制备设计的初步评估。它比较了用相同材料制成的传统和最少准备的树脂粘结CAD / CAM牙冠修复的牙齿的结构完整性和断裂方式,假设用最小树脂粘合牙冠修复的牙齿与传统树脂粘合牙冠修复的牙齿具有相同的断裂强度。 。材料与方法:使用完整的上颌磨牙40颗,分为四组。根据传统的牙冠制备设计制备了两组,并且根据最小制备设计制备了两组。使用CEREC Scan,使用树脂复合材料(Paradigm MZ100,3M ESPE)和白云石玻璃陶瓷(ProCAD,Ivoclar Vivadent)制造牙冠。使用Variolink II(Ivoclar Vivadent)粘合陶瓷牙冠,并使用Rely X Unicem Aplicap(3M ESPE)粘合复合材料牙冠,并加载直至断裂。使用ANOVA比较相同修复材料的牙冠分析负荷数据。还记录并分析了骨折的方式(Kruskal-Wallis)。结果:对于复合材料系统,传统骨折的平均断裂载荷和SD为1682N(+/- 315),最小牙冠的平均断裂载荷和SD为1751N(+/- 338)。对于陶瓷系统,传统的平均断裂载荷和SD为1512N(+/- 373),最小牙冠的平均断裂载荷和SD为1837(+/- 356)。对于每个系统,两种设计之间没有发现统计学上的显着差异。断裂模式的非参数分析(Kruskal-Wallis)显示,两种材料的设计之间没有统计学显着差异(p> .05)。结论:在该实验设计的限制范围内,发现用最少的树脂粘结的CEREC牙冠与传统粘结的牙冠具有相同的抗断裂性和断裂方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号