...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dentistry >Perceptibility and acceptability thresholds for colour differences in dentistry
【24h】

Perceptibility and acceptability thresholds for colour differences in dentistry

机译:牙齿颜色差异的可接受性和可接受性阈值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction Data on acceptability (AT) and perceptibility thresholds (PT) for colour differences vary in dental literature. There is consensus that the determination of ΔE* is appropriate to define AT and PT, however there is no consensus regarding the values that should be used. The aim of this clinical review was to provide a systematic approach to the topic of colour science of high clinical relevance to dental research. Materials and methods MEDLINE/PubMed, WoS and EBSCO databases were searched up to January 7, 2013; the outcome was restricted to English, and to clinical studies were spectrophotometers were used for measurement. Results Forty-eight studies were eligible and met the inclusion criteria. Of the 48 studies there appeared to be a trend in their source references: 44% referred to the same study for the PT (ΔE* = 1); and 35% referred to the same article for the AT (ΔE* = 3.7). Conclusions More than half the studies defined PT as ΔE* = 1, and one third of the studies referred to ΔE* = 3.7 as the threshold at which 50% of observers accepted the colour difference. Most clinical studies refer to the same few in vitro literature that have attempted to determine PT and AT from decades ago.
机译:引言关于颜色差异的可接受性(AT)和可接受性阈值(PT)的数据在牙科文献中有所不同。普遍认为确定ΔE*适用于定义AT和PT,但是对于应使用的值尚无共识。本次临床审查的目的是为与牙科研究具有高度临床相关性的色彩科学主题提供系统的方法。检索截至2013年1月7日的MEDLINE / PubMed,WoS和EBSCO数据库的材料和方法;结果仅限于英语,并且使用分光光度计进行临床研究。结果48项研究符合条件并符合纳入标准。在48项研究中,其来源参考文献似乎呈趋势:44%的研究涉及PT的同一研究(ΔE* = 1);另有35%的人提到了AT的同一文章(ΔE* = 3.7)。结论超过一半的研究将PT定义为ΔE* = 1,三分之一的研究将ΔE* = 3.7定义为50%的观察者接受色差的阈值。大多数临床研究都引用了几十年前尝试确定PT和AT的少数体外文献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号