首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dentistry >Morphological and microtensile bond strength evaluation of three adhesive systems to caries-affected human dentine with chemomechanical caries removal.
【24h】

Morphological and microtensile bond strength evaluation of three adhesive systems to caries-affected human dentine with chemomechanical caries removal.

机译:三种粘合剂系统对受龋影响的人类牙本质的化学和机械去除作用的形态学和微拉伸结合强度评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of chemomechanical caries removal on bond strengths of three adhesive systems to caries-affected human dentine. METHODS: 45 extracted human third molars with occlusal moderate caries were used. One half of each cavity was prepared with chemomechanical method and the other half with bur as the control. Three adhesive systems, Prime&Bond NT (Dentsply, Germany) without any previous conditioning, an etch-and-rinse adhesive (One-Step, Bisco, USA) and a self-etching adhesive (Adper Prompt-L-Pop, 3M ESPE, USA), were applied. The compomer or resin crowns were, then, built up. The prepared specimens were sectioned for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) examination and microtensile bond strength (MTBS) testing. Data were analysed using two-way ANOVA with subsequent application of Student-Newman-Keuls test at p<0.05. RESULTS: Opened dentinal tubules and less smear layer were visible by SEM after chemomechanical caries removal, whilst an obvious smear layer covering the dentine surface with occluded tubules was exhibited after bur excavation. Resin tags were seen only in specimens with chemomechanical excavation when Prime&Bond NT system was applied. Statistical analysis of the values of MTBS failed to show significant difference between caries removal methods. However, the values of MTBS for One-Step system achieved with two caries removal methods were both significant higher than other adhesive systems. CONCLUSIONS: Chemomechanical caries removal did not influence the bond strengths of the adhesive systems used in this study to caries-affected human dentine. Highest bond strength was achieved with application of etch-and-rinse adhesive system.
机译:目的:评估化学机械龋齿去除对三种粘合剂系统与龋齿影响的人类牙本质的粘合强度的影响。方法:使用45颗提取的人类第三磨牙,咬合中度龋齿。每个腔的一半用化学机械方法制备,另一半用bur作为对照。三种胶粘剂系统,Prime&Bond NT(德国,Dentsply),没有任何预先调节,蚀刻和漂洗胶(One-Step,美国Bisco)和自蚀刻胶(Adper Prompt-L-Pop,3M ESPE,美国) ),均已应用。然后建立复合体或树脂冠。将制备的样品切片以进行扫描电子显微镜(SEM)检查和微拉伸粘合强度(MTBS)测试。使用双向方差分析对数据进行分析,随后应用Student-Newman-Keuls检验,p <0.05。结果:化学机械龋齿切除后,SEM可见开放的牙本质小管和较少的涂片层,而bur开挖后显示出明显的涂片层覆盖牙本质表面,并阻塞了小管。当使用Prime&Bond NT系统时,只有在进行化学机械开挖的标本中才能看到树脂标签。 MTBS值的统计分析未能显示出龋齿去除方法之间的显着差异。但是,用两种龋齿去除方法实现的一步系统的MTBS值均明显高于其他粘合剂系统。结论:化学机械龋齿的去除不影响本研究中与龋齿影响的人类牙本质的粘合剂体系的粘结强度。通过使用蚀刻和冲洗粘合剂系统,可以实现最高的粘合强度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号