首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dentistry >Comparison of the hybrid layer formed by Silorane adhesive, one-step self-etch and etch and rinse systems using confocal micro-Raman spectroscopy and SEM.
【24h】

Comparison of the hybrid layer formed by Silorane adhesive, one-step self-etch and etch and rinse systems using confocal micro-Raman spectroscopy and SEM.

机译:通过共聚焦微拉曼光谱和SEM比较了由Silorane粘合剂,一步自蚀刻以及蚀刻和冲洗系统形成的混合层。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent of the hybrid layer (HL) of the novel adhesive system (Silorane, 3M ESPE) compared to one-step and etch and rinse adhesive systems, using 2D confocal micro-Raman spectroscopy and SEM. METHODS: Silorane adhesive system was compared to two one-step self-etch (G Bond, GC; AdheSE One, Ivoclar Vivadent) and etch and rinse (Excite, Ivoclar Vivadent) as controls. Adhesives were applied to human dentine, cured and sections prepared perpendicular to the flat adhesive-dentine surface. Two-dimensional micro-Raman mapping was performed over 20mumx20mum areas across the adhesive-dentine interface. SEM micrographs of the same specimens were obtained. One-way ANOVA (Tukey's post-test) was used to analyse the differences in HL thickness among the four adhesive systems and the paired t-test to compare the results obtained by micro-Raman and SEM for each adhesive. RESULTS: Silorane adhesive system formed a HL of comparable thickness to methacrylate-based but thicker than the acrylamide-based one-step self-etch adhesives from SEM analysis. A gradual decrease in adhesive penetration was observed in all systems. A 1-mum zone, between the cured primer and bond was identified by Raman but not visualised on SEM. Compared to SEM, HL calculated from Raman data were always greater. CONCLUSIONS: Micro-Raman spectroscopy gives a more precise indication of dentine demineralisation and monomer infiltration and highlights the intermediate zone of approximately 1mum between Silorane primer and bond, not visible with SEM at x10,000 magnification. Giving as it does, a compilation of many linear scans it allows HL mean values to be calculated.
机译:目的:使用二维共聚焦显微拉曼光谱和扫描电镜来确定新型粘合剂体系(Silorane,3M ESPE)与一步法以及蚀刻和冲洗粘合剂体系相比的杂化层(HL)的程度。方法:将Silorane胶粘剂系统与两个单步自蚀刻(G Bond,GC; AdheSE One,Ivoclar Vivadent)进行比较,并进行蚀刻和冲洗(Excite,Ivoclar Vivadent)作为对照。将粘合剂施加到人的牙本质上,进行固化,并准备垂直于平坦粘合剂-牙本质表面的切片。横跨粘合剂-牙本质界面在20mumx20mum的区域上进行了二维微拉曼映射。获得了相同样品的SEM显微照片。使用单向方差分析(Tukey's post-test)分析四种胶粘剂系统之间的HL厚度差异,并使用配对t检验比较每种胶粘剂通过显微拉曼光谱和SEM获得的结果。结果:Silorane粘合剂体系形成的HL厚度与基于甲基丙烯酸酯的HL相当,但比通过SEM分析得到的基于丙烯酰胺的一步式自蚀刻粘合剂更厚。在所有系统中观察到粘合剂渗透率逐渐降低。拉曼光谱鉴定了固化底漆和粘结层之间的1微米区域,但在SEM上看不到。与SEM相比,根据拉曼数据计算得出的HL总是更大。结论:显微拉曼光谱能更准确地指示牙本质脱矿质和单体浸润,并突出显示了在Silorane底漆和键之间大约1μm的中间区域,在10,000倍的SEM下,SEM无法看到。通过这样做,可以对许多线性扫描进行汇总,从而可以计算HL平均值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号