...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of drug assessment >Alginate rafting agents in gastro-oesophageal reflux disorder: a critical review
【24h】

Alginate rafting agents in gastro-oesophageal reflux disorder: a critical review

机译:海藻酸盐漂流剂治疗胃食管反流病:一项重要综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disorder (GORD) is common in the industrialised world, impairs health-related quality of life and either causes or exacerbates several potentially serious conditions. Alginates, which are either purchased over the counter or prescribed, are widely used in GORD management. Nevertheless, there is a need to better characterise the relative merits and limitations of drugs used to treat GORD. Previous studies offer some such evidence for proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and H_2 receptor antagonists. However, reviews of alginates are sparse.As a result, this review aimed to characterise the efficacy, tolerability and pharmacoeconomics of alginates in GORD management. The review also aimed to determine whether the choice of alginate influenced sodium load. The recent advice by the UK Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition(SACN) to reduce average salt intake prompted this consideration.The evidence base supporting alginates is less extensive than that for either H_2 receptor antagonists or PPIs. Nevertheless, alginates appear to be effective and well tolerated in GORD. There is no compelling evidence that alginate formulations differ in either efficacy or tolerability. Sodium load and cost seem to be the only factors that differentiate the formulations.A cost-minimisation analysis from the perspective of the UK suggested that Gastrocote~R is preferable to Gaviscon~R. The differences in formulation result in Gaviscon?being associated with higher sodium load than Gastrocote~R and Gaviscon~R Advance. As the other clinical outcomes are similar, it is reasonable, on balance, to suggest that Gastrocote~R should be the alginate of choice for GORD. Further studies are needed, however, to confirm this hypothesis.
机译:胃食管反流病(GORD)在工业化世界中很常见,会损害与健康相关的生活质量,并会导致或加剧一些潜在的严重疾病。在柜台上购买或指定购买的藻酸盐已广泛用于GORD管理中。尽管如此,仍需要更好地表征用于治疗GORD的药物的相对优缺点。先前的研究为质子泵抑制剂(PPI)和H_2受体拮抗剂提供了一些证据。然而,藻酸盐的评论很少,因此,本综述旨在描述藻酸盐在GORD管理中的功效,耐受性和药物经济学特征。审查还旨在确定藻酸盐的选择是否影响钠负荷。英国营养科学咨询委员会(SACN)最近提出的减少平均盐摄入量的建议促使了这一考虑。支持藻酸盐的证据基础不及H_2受体拮抗剂或PPI广泛。然而,藻酸盐似乎在GORD中是有效的并且具有良好的耐受性。没有令人信服的证据表明藻酸盐制剂的功效或耐受性不同。钠的含量和成本似乎是使配方差异化的唯一因素。英国的成本最小化分析表明,Gastrocote〜R比Gaviscon〜R更可取。与Gastrocote®R和Gaviscon®R Advance相比,Gaviscon®的配方差异导致钠负荷更高。由于其他临床结果相似,因此总的来说,有理由认为Gastrocote〜R应该是GORD的首选藻酸盐。但是,需要进一步的研究来证实这一假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号