首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgery >Evaluation of the effectiveness of imiquimod and 5-fluorouracil for the treatment of actinic keratosis: Critical review and meta-analysis of efficacy studies.
【24h】

Evaluation of the effectiveness of imiquimod and 5-fluorouracil for the treatment of actinic keratosis: Critical review and meta-analysis of efficacy studies.

机译:咪喹莫特和5-氟尿嘧啶治疗光化性角化病的有效性评估:疗效研究的关键回顾和荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Actinic keratosis lesions occur frequently on sun-exposed skin of Caucasians. They become more prevalent with advancing age and are important in identifying the risk factor of those people possibly predisposed to invasive squamous cell carcinoma. Topical therapies are useful alternatives to cryotherapy for treating diffuse actinic damage and a number of preparations have been developed for treating actinic keratosis. OBJECTIVES: A cumulative meta-analysis was performed to determine the efficacy of imiquimod 5% cream, which presents a new alternative topical therapy for actinic keratosis, and to compare it to 5-fluorouracil for the treatment of actinic keratosis lesions of the face and scalp. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (1966 to October 2004) for relevant studies evaluating the efficacy of actinic keratosis topical agents imiquimod and 5-fluorouracil (0.5%, 1%, and 5%). Studies included in this meta-analysis required a dosage regimen that was not significantly different from that approved by Health Canada and the U.S. FDA. Studies also required a well-defined treatment duration and followup period, with the primary efficacy variable being the complete (100%) clearance of all actinic keratosis lesions defined as the proportion of patients at followup with no clinically visible lesions in the treatment area. To determine the average efficacy rate for both drugs, the data from each study were combined for that drug. RESULTS: Ten studies were included in the analysis. The average efficacy rate for each drug (with 95% confidence interval) was 5-fluorouracil, 52 +/- 18% (n = 6 studies, 145 subjects) and imiquimod, 70 +/- 12% (n = 4 studies, 393 subjects). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis show that both imiquimod and 5-fluorouracil are effective methods for the treatment of actinic keratosis and provide a useful alternative to cryotherapy. However, this analysis suggests that imiquimod may have higher efficacy than 5-fluorouracil for actinic keratosis lesions located on the face and scalp and therefore provides another option to dermatologists.
机译:背景:光化性角化病病变经常发生在高加索人暴露于阳光的皮肤上。随着年龄的增长,它们变得越来越普遍,并且对于确定可能易患浸润性鳞状细胞癌的人群的危险因素非常重要。局部疗法是冷冻疗法用于治疗弥漫性光化性损害的有用替代方法,并且已经开发出许多用于治疗光化性角化病的制剂。目的:进行了一项累积荟萃分析,以确定咪喹莫特5%乳膏的疗效,该乳膏为光化性角化病提供了一种新的局部治疗方法,并将其与5-氟尿嘧啶进行了比较,以治疗面部和头皮的光化性角化病病变。方法:我们在MEDLINE(1966年至2004年10月)中进行了相关研究,以评估光化性角化病局部用药咪喹莫特和5-氟尿嘧啶(0.5%,1%和5%)的疗效。这项荟萃分析中的研究要求的剂量方案与加拿大卫生部和美国FDA批准的剂量方案没有显着差异。研究还需要明确的治疗持续时间和随访时间,主要功效变量是所有光化性角化病病变的完全(100%)清除率,定义为随访时治疗区域内无临床可见病变的患者比例。为了确定两种药物的平均疗效率,将每个研究的数据合并为该药物。结果:十项研究被纳入分析。每种药物的平均有效率(置信区间为95%)为5-氟尿嘧啶52 +/- 18%(n = 6个研究,145个受试者)和咪喹莫特,70 +/- 12%(n = 4个研究,393)主题)。结论:这项荟萃分析的结果表明,咪喹莫特和5-氟尿嘧啶都是治疗光化性角化病的有效方法,并为冷冻疗法提供了有用的替代方法。但是,该分析表明,咪喹莫特对面部和头皮上的光化性角化病病变的疗效可能高于5-氟尿嘧啶,因此为皮肤科医生提供了另一种选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号