首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cross-cultural psychology >Moderation Effects of Power Distance on the Relationship Between Types of Empowerment and Employee Satisfaction
【24h】

Moderation Effects of Power Distance on the Relationship Between Types of Empowerment and Employee Satisfaction

机译:权力距离对授权类型与员工满意度之间关系的调节作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Previous research concludes that empowerment is ineffective with employees from societies high in power distance. The present study examines this conclusion across three types of empowerment: discretion empowerment, psychological empowerment, and leadership empowerment (or empowerment leadership behaviors). To assess the effects of power distance on these three types of empowerment, employee surveys were conducted in Canada (a society low in power distance) and in China (a society high in power distance). Results showed that the effect of discretion empowerment on employee satisfaction was less pronounced in China, just as previous literature had concluded about the dynamics of societies high in power distance. However, the effect of the leadership empowerment on employee satisfaction via the competence facet of psychological empowerment was found to be more pronounced in Canada, a society lower in power distance. These conclusions at the cultural level were also confirmed at the psychological level. We thus advocate that empowerment remains an advantageous strategy to organizations in both societies and individuals high and low in power distance, depending on the type of empowerment involved.
机译:先前的研究得出的结论是,对于权力距离遥远的社会,增强员工的能力是无效的。本研究从三种类型的授权中检验了这一结论:酌处权,心理授权和领导权(或领导行为)。为了评估权力距离对这三种授权的影响,在加拿大(权力距离低的社会)和中国(权力距离高的社会)进行了员工调查。结果表明,正如先前的文献得出有关权力距离高的社会动态的结论一样,在中国,自由裁量权对员工满意度的影响不太明显。但是,在权力距离较低的社会加拿大,通过心理授权的能力方面来增强领导才能对员工满意度的影响更为明显。这些结论在文化层面上也得到了心理层面的证实。因此,我们主张,根据所涉及的授权类型,授权对于社会和权力距离高低的个人而言,仍然是组织的有利策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号