首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cross-cultural psychology >Fire and ice: Testing a model on culture and complex problem solving
【24h】

Fire and ice: Testing a model on culture and complex problem solving

机译:火与冰:测试文化和复杂问题解决模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Extending research on complex problem solving (CPS) and dynamic decision making (DDM), this study investigated the relationship between horizontal-vertical individualism-collectivism, complex problem-solving strategies, and performance in two computer-simulated problem scenarios with different task demands.Participants were 535 students from Germany and the United States (both high on horizontal individualism), Brazil (high on horizontal collectivism), and India and the Philippines (both high on vertical collectivism).Path analyses revealed that horizontal individualism, horizontal collectivism, and vertical collectivism were related to action orientation, and action orientation and planning strategies were related to performance.Strategies were even stronger predictors of performance than the control variables computer experience and intelligence.The structural path model was confirmed for the overall sample and for each of the five national samples.Cross-cultural differences in the process model are discussed.Results showed the importance of cultural values in cognitive processing, specifically for the selection of CPS strategies.
机译:在扩展了对复杂问题解决(CPS)和动态决策(DDM)的研究的基础上,本研究研究了在两种具有不同任务需求的计算机模拟问题场景中,横向-垂直个人主义-集体主义,复杂的问题解决策略与绩效之间的关系。参加者有535名学生,分别来自德国和美国(在水平个人主义上都很高),巴西(在水平集体主义上都很高),印度和菲律宾(在垂直集体主义上都很高)。路径分析显示,水平个人主义,水平集体主义和纵向集体主义与行动导向有关,行动导向和计划策略与绩效有关。与控制变量的计算机经验和智力相比,战略甚至是更强的绩效预测指标。对于整个样本和每个样本,都确定了结构路径模型五个国家样本。结果表明文化价值在认知加工中的重要性,特别是对于CPS策略的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号