首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cross-cultural psychology >Every scienceature potter praises his own pot-can we believe what he says based on his mother tongue?
【24h】

Every scienceature potter praises his own pot-can we believe what he says based on his mother tongue?

机译:每个科学/自然界的陶艺家都称赞他自己的陶艺-我们能相信他根据母语说的话吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

It has been consistently observed that people are generally overconfident in their judgments or decisions and that overconfidence in general knowledge is typically stronger among Asian than among Western subject groups. However, scientists, whose job is to produce neutral and objective knowledge, are expected to be immune to overconfidence and to be independent of cross-cultural variation. The authors conducted an email survey to determine whether well-trained scholars are really immune to the overconfidence bias and whether cross-cultural variations in overconfidence exist among scientists from different language backgrounds. Contrary to the authors' expectations, scientists who published their works in Science or Nature were inaccurate, overconfident, likely to nominate the journal they published in to have a greater impact factor, and easier to generate supportive rather than opposite arguments for their own conclusions. The authors also found that Chinese-speaking authors exhibited greater overconfidence but generated fewer arguments than did their English-speaking counterparts, which is consistent with Yates, Lee, and Shinotsuka's argument recruitment model. The pervasive overconfidence and its cross-cultural variations suggest that an academic author may not communicate his or her conclusions to readers in an impartial and value-free manner, and therefore, the job of detecting bias is hoped to be taken and done well by the reader.
机译:一直以来都观察到,人们通常对自己的判断或决定过于自信,而亚洲人对一般知识的过度自信通常比西方学科群体更强。但是,科学家的工作是产生中立和客观的知识,预计他们可以避免过度自信,并且不受跨文化差异的影响。作者进行了电子邮件调查,以确定受过良好训练的学者是否真的能够免受过度自信偏见的影响,以及来自不同语言背景的科学家之间是否存在过度自信的跨文化差异。与作者的期望相反,在《科学》或《自然》杂志上发表论文的科学家们不准确,过于自信,他们很可能会提名他们发表的期刊具有更大的影响因子,并且更容易产生支持性而非反对性的结论。作者还发现,与以英语为母语的同行相比,以汉语为母语的作者表现出更大的过分自信,但产生的论点更少,这与耶茨,李和Shinotsuka的论点招募模型相一致。普遍的过度自信及其跨文化的差异表明,学术作者可能不会以公正和无价值的方式向读者传达他或她的结论,因此,希望发现偏见的工作能够被作者采取并做好。读者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号