首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cross-cultural psychology >Social Axioms in 33 Countries: Good Replicability at the Individual But Less So at the Country Level
【24h】

Social Axioms in 33 Countries: Good Replicability at the Individual But Less So at the Country Level

机译:33个国家/地区的社会公理:个人具有良好的重复性,但在国家/地区则不那么容易

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this article, we report on an attempt to replicate findings with social axioms. Participants from 33 countries (total N = 7,825) were given a 30-item questionnaire based on the work of Leung et al. Several different methods of factor analysis were used, and individual-level as well as the aggregated (nation-level) data were examined. The five-factor structure of social axioms did replicate at the individual level. At the country and world regions level of analysis, however, our findings differ from what has been reported previously. As before, the most pronounced arithmetic mean differences were obtained on Religiosity, with South East Asian region and Malaysia in particular scoring high and Western Europe, especially Spain, being low. Even though cross-cultural differences in Social Complexity were not pronounced, they are comparable in size with what has been reported for social attitudes. Differences between world regions on Social Cynicism, Fate Control, and Reward for Application were in-between those for Religiosity and Social Complexity. These results indicate that social axioms are useful constructs for cross-cultural comparisons.
机译:在本文中,我们报告了尝试用社会公理复制发现的尝试。根据Leung等人的工作,从33个国家(总数N = 7,825)中获得了30项问卷。使用了几种不同的因素分析方法,并检查了个人数据以及汇总(国家数据)数据。社会公理的五因素结构确实在个人层面上得以复制。但是,在国家和世界地区的分析水平上,我们的发现与以前的报道有所不同。与以前一样,在宗教性方面获得了最明显的算术平均差异,东南亚地区和马来西亚尤其得分高,西欧特别是西班牙得分低。尽管在社会复杂性方面的跨文化差异并未得到明显体现,但它们的规模可与社会态度方面的报道相提并论。世界区域之间在社会犬儒主义,命运控制和申请奖励方面的差异介于宗教和社会复杂性之间。这些结果表明,社会公理是跨文化比较的有用构造。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号