...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cytology >Comparison of aspiration vs non-aspiration techniques in fine-needle cytology of thyroid lesions
【24h】

Comparison of aspiration vs non-aspiration techniques in fine-needle cytology of thyroid lesions

机译:甲状腺病变细针细胞学检查中抽吸技术与非抽吸技术的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aim: To compare the efficacy of fine-needle non-aspiration cytology (FNNAC) with that of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of thyroid lesions. Materials and Methods: FNAC and FNNAC techniques were studied in 50 cases of thyroid lesions. All the needle-sampling procedures were done by a single operator. The samples were assessed cytologically and evaluated using five parameters, that is. background blood or clot, amount of cellular material, degree of cellular degeneration, and degree of cellulartrauma and retention of appropriate architecture. Statistical Analysis: Wilcoxon signed rank test was performed using SPSS14 software. Differences between all the individual parameters as observed in FNAC and FNNAC smears were insignificant. Results andConclusion: After evaluation of FNAC and FNNAC on the basis of these scores, greater numbers of diagnostically superior samples were obtained by FNNAC; however, by FNAC more number of diagnostically adequate smears were observed. The numbers of unsuitable smears were also more by FNNAC technique.
机译:目的:比较细针非抽吸细胞学(FNNAC)和甲状腺病变的细针抽吸细胞学(FNAC)的疗效。材料与方法:研究了FNAC和FNNAC技术在50例甲状腺病变中的应用。所有的针头采样程序均由一名操作员完成。对样品进行细胞学评估,并使用五个参数进行评估。背景血液或凝块,细胞物质的数量,细胞变性的程度,细胞创伤的程度以及适当结构的保留。统计分析:使用SPSS14软件执行Wilcoxon签名秩检验。 FNAC和FNNAC涂片中观察到的所有单个参数之间的差异均不显着。结果与结论:根据这些分数对FNAC和FNNAC进行评估后,FNNAC获得了更多的诊断上优越的样本。但是,通过FNAC,可以观察到更多的诊断上足够的涂片。通过FNNAC技术,不适合涂片的数量也更多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号