...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine: CCLM >Genotyping of hemochromatosis-associated mutations in the HFE gene by PCR-RFLP and a novel reverse hybridization method.
【24h】

Genotyping of hemochromatosis-associated mutations in the HFE gene by PCR-RFLP and a novel reverse hybridization method.

机译:通过PCR-RFLP和新型反向杂交方法对HFE基因中血色素沉着病相关突变进行基因分型。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Comparative analysis of the hemochromatosis-associated mutations C282Y, H63D and S65C in the HFE gene in 51 patients using three different methods is reported. One PCR-RFLP method was based on general primers, whereas another employed mutation-specific mismatched primers. The third method was a new PCR-based reverse hybridisation line probe assay (LiPA), comprising DNA amplification by general primers followed by a single step reverse hybridization to specific probes, immobilized on a nitrocellulose strip. Forty-eight (94%) of the 51 samples yielded identical results by all three methods. Three discrepant results were obtained, caused by polymorphisms in the primer binding region, resulting in no amplification at all or selective amplification, leading to misinterpretation of the HFE genotype by PCR-RFLP. The design of the assay and the stringency of the reaction conditions used are crucial to obtain a correct HFE genotype. PCR-LiPA offers an easy and reliable alternative to currently used conventional methods.
机译:报道了使用三种不同方法对51例HFE基因中与血色素沉着病相关的突变C282Y,H63D和S65C的比较分析。一种PCR-RFLP方法基于一般引物,而另一种则采用突变特异性错配引物。第三种方法是一种新的基于PCR的反向杂交线探针测定法(LiPA),包括通过一般引物进行DNA扩增,然后与固定在硝酸纤维素条上的特定探针进行一步反向杂交。通过这三种方法,在51个样品中有48个(94%)产生了相同的结果。由于引物结合区的多态性导致获得三个不同的结果,导致根本没有扩增或没有选择性扩增,从而导致PCR-RFLP对HFE基因型的错误解释。分析的设计和所用反应条件的严格性对于获得正确的HFE基因型至关重要。 PCR-LiPA为当前使用的常规方法提供了一种简单可靠的替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号