首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Dental Research: Official Publication of the International Association for Dental Research >Efficacy and safety of biodegradable osteofixation devices in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a systematic review.
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of biodegradable osteofixation devices in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a systematic review.

机译:可生物降解的骨固定装置在口腔颌面外科手术中的功效和安全性:系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The use of osteofixation devices should be evidence-based if uncomplicated bone healing is to be achieved. Numerous studies describe and claim the advantages of biodegradable over titanium devices as a bone fixation method. Here, we systematically review the available literature to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of biodegradable devices compared with titanium devices in oral and maxillofacial surgery. In addition, related general aspects of bone surgery are discussed. We conducted a highly sensitive search in the databases of MEDLINE (1966-2005), EMBASE (1989-2005), and CENTRAL (1800-2005) to identify eligible studies. Eligible studies were independently evaluated by two assessors using a quality assessment scale. The study selection procedure revealed four methodologically 'acceptable' articles. Owing to the different outcome measures used in the studies, it was impossible to perform a meta-analysis. Therefore, the major effects regarding the stability and morbidity of fracture fixation using titanium and biodegradable fixation systems were qualitatively described. Any firm conclusions regarding the fixation of traumatically fractured bone segments cannot be drawn, due to the lack of controlled clinical trials. Regarding the fixation of bone segments in orthognathic surgery, only a few controlled clinical studies are available. There does not appear to be a significant short-term difference between titanium and biodegradable fixation systems regarding stability and morbidity. However, definite conclusions, especially with respect to the long-term performance of biodegradable fixation devices used in maxillofacial surgery, cannot be drawn.
机译:如果要实现简单的骨愈合,则应以证据为基础使用骨固定装置。大量研究描述并声称可生物降解的钛固定装置比钛固定装置具有更多的优势。在这里,我们系统地回顾了现有文献,以确定在口腔颌面外科手术中与钛器械相比可生物降解器械的临床疗效和安全性。另外,讨论了骨外科的相关一般方面。我们在MEDLINE(1966-2005),EMBASE(1989-2005)和CENTRAL(1800-2005)的数据库中进行了高度敏感的搜索,以找出合格的研究。合格的研究由两名评估者使用质量评估量表进行独立评估。研究选择程序揭示了四篇方法学上可接受的文章。由于研究中使用了不同的结局指标,因此无法进行荟萃分析。因此,定性描述了有关使用钛和生物可降解固定系统进行骨折固定的稳定性和发病率的主要影响。由于缺乏受控的临床试验,因此无法得出有关固定骨折性骨折的任何确凿结论。关于正颌外科手术中骨节段的固定,只有少数对照临床研究可用。在稳定性和发病率方面,钛和可生物降解的固定系统之间似乎没有明显的短期差异。但是,不能得出明确的结论,尤其是在颌面外科手术中使用的可生物降解固定装置的长期性能方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号