首页> 外文期刊>Journal of chromatography, A: Including electrophoresis and other separation methods >Evaluation of the extraction efficiency of thermally labile bioactive compounds in Gastrodia elata Blume by pressurized hot water extraction and microwave-assisted extraction
【24h】

Evaluation of the extraction efficiency of thermally labile bioactive compounds in Gastrodia elata Blume by pressurized hot water extraction and microwave-assisted extraction

机译:加压热水萃取和微波辅助萃取对天麻中热不稳定生物活性化合物的萃取效率评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Our earlier work showed that the stability of the bioactive compounds gastrodin (GA) and vanillyl alcohol (VA) in Gastrodia elata Blume behaved differently with varying compositions of water-ethanol using pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) at room temperature. To have a better understanding of the extraction process of these thermally labile compounds under elevated temperature conditions, pressurized hot water extraction (PHWE) and microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) methods were proposed. PHWE and MAE showed that GA and VA could be extracted using pure water under optimized conditions of temperature and extraction time. The extraction efficiency of GA and VA by the proposed methods was found to be higher or comparable to heating under reflux using water. The marker compounds present in the plant extracts were determined by RP-HPLC. The optimized conditions were found to be different for the two proposed methods on extraction of GA and VA. The method precision (RSD, n=6) was found to vary from 0.92% to 3.36% for the two proposed methods on different days. Hence, PHWE and MAE methods were shown to be feasible alternatives for the extraction of thermally labile marker compounds present in medicinal plants. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:我们较早的工作表明,天麻中生物活性化合物天麻素(GA)和香兰醇(VA)的稳定性在室温下使用加压液体萃取(PLE)改变水-乙醇成分时表现不同。为了更好地理解高温条件下这些对热不稳定化合物的萃取过程,提出了加压热水萃取(PHWE)和微波辅助萃取(MAE)方法。 PHWE和MAE表明,在最佳温度和提取时间条件下,可以使用纯水提取GA和VA。发现通过所提出的方法对GA和VA的提取效率与使用水回流加热时更高或相当。通过RP-HPLC测定植物提取物中存在的标志物化合物。发现两种拟议的提取GA和VA的方法的优化条件是不同的。发现两种方法在不同日期的方法精度(RSD,n = 6)在0.92%至3.36%之间。因此,PHWE和MAE方法被证明是提取药用植物中热不稳定标记化合物的可行替代方法。 (C)2008 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号