首页> 外文期刊>Journal of computer assisted tomography >Interobserver reliability in the assessment of coronary stenoses by multidetector computed tomography.
【24h】

Interobserver reliability in the assessment of coronary stenoses by multidetector computed tomography.

机译:通过多探测器计算机断层扫描评估冠状动脉狭窄的观察者间可靠性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine the interobserver reliability for grading coronary stenosis severity with coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA). METHODS: Five readers independently reviewed 40 CCTA studies, first the axial images alone, then in combination with multiplanar reconstructions. The stenosis severity in each segment was scored on a 5-point scale. Intraclass correlation (ICC) analysis was performed to assess interobserver reliability on a segmental basis. RESULTS: The reliability was good to moderate in the right coronary artery, left main artery, left anterior descending artery and branches, and the proximal circumflex (ICC: 0.44-0.75) but fair to poor for the posterior descending artery, the posterolateral branch, the obtuse marginal branches, and the distal circumflex (ICC: 0.15-0.39). The ICC correlated with the reference diameter. Although there was no significant difference in the ICC between the scanner types, there were more unevaluable segments in the 16-row scanner compared with the 64-row scanner (2.4 vs 1.4 segments/patient). Addition of multiplanar reconstruction to axial images led to fewer uninterpretable segments and reclassification of stenosis grade in 23% of the segments. CONCLUSIONS: Interobserver reliability for stenosis severity by CCTA varies between segments and correlates with the reference diameter.
机译:目的:通过冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影(CCTA)确定冠状动脉狭窄严重程度分级的观察者间可靠性。方法:五位读者分别回顾了40个CCTA研究,首先是单独的轴向图像,然后是多平面重建。每个部分的狭窄严重程度以5分制评分。进行了类内相关性(ICC)分析,以分段方式评估观察者之间的可靠性。结果:在右冠状动脉,左主动脉,左前降支和分支以及近端回旋支(ICC:0.44-0.75)中,可靠性良好至中度,但对于后降支,后外侧支,可靠性中等至差。钝缘边缘分支和远回旋支(ICC:0.15-0.39)。 ICC与参考直径相关。尽管两种扫描仪之间的ICC没有显着差异,但与64行扫描仪相比,16行扫描仪中有更多不可估量的部分(每位患者2.4 vs 1.4段)。在轴向图像上添加多平面重建可导致更少的无法解释的节段,并在23%的节段中对狭窄程度进行重新分类。结论:CCTA对狭窄严重程度的观察者间可靠性在各节之间有所不同,并且与参考直径相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号