...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of computer assisted tomography >Assessing the adequacy of peripherally inserted central catheters for power injection of intravenous contrast agents for CT.
【24h】

Assessing the adequacy of peripherally inserted central catheters for power injection of intravenous contrast agents for CT.

机译:评估外围插入的中央导管是否足以进行CT静脉造影剂的动力注入。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to determine the tolerance of silicone peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) of different sizes and lengths to power injection of contrast materials at flow rates suitable for CT studies. METHOD: Fifty silicone PICCs in three single-lumen sizes (3 to 5F) and two double-lumen sizes (6 and 7F) were cut to two lengths (35 and 45 cm), and a uniform volume of 74% ioversol was injected into each at increasing rates of flow by a power injector. The flow rate, volume, and peak pressure were recorded for each injection. RESULTS: The respective tolerated flows for the 35 and 45 cm PICCs were 0.65 ml/s at 125 psi and 0.56 ml/s at 125 psi for the 3F catheters, 1.58 ml/s at 150 psi and 1.04 ml/s at 150 psi for the 4F catheters, 4.20 ml/s at 200 psi and 3.02 ml/s at 170 psi for the 5F catheters, 1.50 ml/s at 145 psi and 0.88 ml/s at 150 psi for the 6F catheters, and 9.52 ml/s at 350 psi and 8.78 ml/s at 330 psi for the 7F catheters. CONCLUSION: The 3F catheters were unsuitable for power injection for CT studies because they could not accommodate adequate flow rates. The 4F single-lumen and 6F double-lumen catheters withstood flow rates that were marginally adequate for CT studies. The 5F single-lumen and 7F double-lumen PICCs tolerated peak flows and pressures well within the range necessary to allow power injection of contrast materials for CT studies. For each size of PICC, the 35 cm length withstood higher flow rates than the 45 cm length before failure.
机译:目的:这项工作的目的是确定不同尺寸和长度的硅胶外围插入中央导管(PICC)的耐受性,以适合于CT研究的流速动力注入造影剂。方法:将三种单腔尺寸(3至5F)和两种双腔尺寸(6和7F)的五十种硅树脂PICC切成两种长度(35和45 cm),并向其中注入均匀体积的74%的艾弗索尔每个都通过动力注射器以增加的流量流动。记录每次进样的流速,体积和峰值压力。结果:对于3F导管,35 cm和45 cm PICC的相应耐受流量分别为:125 psi下为0.65 ml / s,125 psi下为0.56 ml / s,150 psi下为1.58 ml / s,150 psi下为1.04 ml / s。 4F导管,在200 psi下为4.20 ml / s,在5F导管下为170 psi,3.02 ml / s,在145 psi下为1.50 ml / s,在150 psi,为6F导管,0.88 ml / s,在9.52 ml / s对于7F导管,在330 psi下压力为350 psi和8.78 ml / s。结论:3F导管不适合动力注入进行CT研究,因为它们不能适应足够的流速。 4F单腔和6F双腔导管的流速足以满足CT研究的需要。 5F单腔和7F双腔PICC可以承受的峰值流量和压力都在为CT研究注入造影剂所需的功率范围内。对于每种尺寸的PICC,35厘米长的流率比故障前45厘米长的流率高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号