首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Epidemiology >Development of the review quality instrument (RQI) for assessing peer reviews of manuscripts.
【24h】

Development of the review quality instrument (RQI) for assessing peer reviews of manuscripts.

机译:开发用于评估手稿同行评审的评审质量工具(RQI)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Research on the value of peer review is limited by the lack of a validated instrument to measure the quality of reviews. The aim of this study was to develop a simple, reliable, and valid scale that could be used in studies of peer review. A Review Quality Instrument (RQI) that assesses the extent to which a reviewer has commented on five aspects of a manuscript (importance of the research question, originality of the paper, strengths and weaknesses of the method, presentation, interpretation of results) and on two aspects of the review (constructiveness and substantiation of comments) was devised and tested. Its internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha 0.84). The mean total score (based on the seven items each scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 to 5) had good test-retest (Kw = 1.00) and inter-rater (Kw = 0.83) reliability. There was no evidence of floor or ceiling effects, construct validity was evident, and the respondent burden was acceptable (2-10 minutes). Although improvements to the RQI should be pursued, the instrument can be recommended for use in the study of peer review.
机译:同行评审价值的研究受到缺乏衡量评审质量的有效工具的限制。这项研究的目的是开发一种简单,可靠和有效的量表,以用于同行评审研究。评论质量工具(RQI),用于评估审稿人对稿件的五个方面(研究问题的重要性,论文的原创性,方法的优缺点,介绍,结果的解释)和设计和测试了评审的两个方面(评论的建设性和证实性)。其内部一致性很高(Cronbach的alpha为0.84)。平均总分(基于从1到5的5分Likert量表分别评分的七个项目)的重测信度(Kw = 1.00)和评定者间(Kw = 0.83)的可靠性。没有迹象表明有地板或天花板的影响,建筑的有效性是明显的,被调查者的负担是可以接受的(2-10分钟)。尽管应该对RQI进行改进,但是可以推荐该工具用于同行评审研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号