Discordances originated by multiple meta-analyses on interventions for myocardial infarction: a systematic review

Lucenteforte Ersilia; Moja Lorenzo; Pecoraro Valentina; Conti Andrea A.; Conti Antonio; Crudeli Elena; Galli Alessio; Gensini Gian Franco; Minnelli Martina; Mugelli Alessandro; Proietti Riccardo; Shtylla Jonida; DAmico Roberto; Parmelli Elena; Virgili Gianni

首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Epidemiology >Discordances originated by multiple meta-analyses on interventions for myocardial infarction: a systematic review

【24h】

Discordances originated by multiple meta-analyses on interventions for myocardial infarction: a systematic review

机译：由对心肌梗塞干预的多种荟萃分析引起的不一致：系统评价

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

团队文献服务 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
引文网络
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Objectives: To clarify the impact of multiple (covering the same population, intervention, control, and outcomes) systematic reviews (SRs) on interventions for myocardial infarction (Ml).

机译：目标：阐明多个（涵盖相同人群，干预，控制和结果的）系统评价（SR）对心肌梗塞（MI）干预的影响。

著录项

来源
《Journal of Clinical Epidemiology》 |2015年第3期|共11页
作者
Lucenteforte Ersilia; Moja Lorenzo; Pecoraro Valentina; Conti Andrea A.; Conti Antonio; Crudeli Elena; Galli Alessio; Gensini Gian Franco; Minnelli Martina; Mugelli Alessandro; Proietti Riccardo; Shtylla Jonida; DAmico Roberto; Parmelli Elena; Virgili Gianni;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类流行病学与防疫;
关键词
Cardiovascular agents; Dissent and disputes; Evidence based medicine; Meta-analysis; Myocardial infarction; Policy making;

机译：心血管病;异议和纠纷;循证医学;meta分析;心肌梗塞;政策制定;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Discordances originated by multiple meta-analyses on interventions for myocardial infarction: a systematic review [J] . Lucenteforte Ersilia, Moja Lorenzo, Pecoraro Valentina, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology . 2015,第3期

机译：由对心肌梗塞干预的多种荟萃分析引起的不一致：系统评价
2. Field triage in the ambulance versus referral via non-percutaneous coronary intervention centre in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review [J] . Sonja Postma, Evelien Kolkman, Sidney M Rubinstein European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care . 2017,第5期

机译：救护车的野外分离与在初前经皮冠状动脉介入的ST升高心肌梗死患者中通过非经皮冠状动脉干预中心进行转介：系统审查
3. Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 7: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies [J] . Laxmaiah Manchikanti MD Richard Derby MD Lee R. Wolfer MD Vijay Singh MD Sukdeb Datta MD, Joshua A. Hirsch MD. Pain Physician . 2009,第6期

机译：介入性疼痛管理中的循证医学，系统评价和指南：第7部分：诊断准确性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
4. Web-based Self-management Support Interventions for Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses [C] . Ae Ran Kim, Hyeoun-Ae Park MEDINFO . 2015

机译：癌症幸存者的基于网络的自我管理支持干预：系统审查和荟萃分析
5. Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses on Effects of Ayurvedic Interventions for Hypercholesterolemia, Hypertension, and Coronary Heart Disease [D] . Gyawali, Dinesh. 2017

机译：阿育吠陀干预对高胆固醇血症，高血压和冠心病的影响的系统评价和荟萃分析
6. Effect of preoperative loading dose ticagrelor and clopidogrel on no-reflow phenomenon during intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis [O] . Weiran Dai, Ziliang Ye, Lang Li, 2018

机译：术前加量替卡格雷和氯吡格雷对ST段抬高型心肌梗死行初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者在手术过程中无复流现象的影响：系统评价和荟萃分析
7. Discordances originated by multiple meta-analyses on interventions for myocardial infarction: a systematic review [O] . Lucenteforte, Ersilia, Moja, Lorenzo, Pecoraro, Valentina, 2015

机译：对心肌梗塞的干预进行多次荟萃分析所引起的不一致：系统评价

Discordances originated by multiple meta-analyses on interventions for myocardial infarction: a systematic review

摘要

著录项

引文网络

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅