...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Epidemiology >Assessing the applicability of findings in systematic reviews of complex interventions can enhance the utility of reviews for decision making
【24h】

Assessing the applicability of findings in systematic reviews of complex interventions can enhance the utility of reviews for decision making

机译:评估结果在复杂干预措施的系统评价中的适用性可以增强评价在决策制定中的效用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Assessment of applicability is an essential part of the systematic review process. In the context of systematic reviews of the effects of interventions, applicability is an assessment of whether the findings of a review can be applied in a particular context or population. For more complex interventions, assessing applicability can be challenging because of greater diversity of, and interactions within and between, the intended population, intervention components, comparison conditions, and outcomes as well as a range of further considerations related to intervention context and theoretical basis. We recommend that review authors plan and conduct analyses to explain variations in effect and answer questions about mechanisms of action and influence of different settings, contexts, and populations. We also recommend that review authors provide rich descriptions of the setting, implementation details, resource use, and contexts of included studies and assess applicability for at least one target population, setting, and context. This should facilitate applicability assessments by end users. Consensus on terminology is needed and guidance should be developed for the synthesis of implementation information within reviews as well as the documentation of applicability judgments by review authors.
机译:适用性评估是系统审查流程的重要组成部分。在对干预措施的效果进行系统评估的情况下,适用性是对评估结果是否可以在特定环境或人群中进行评估。对于更复杂的干预措施,由于预期人群,干预措施组成部分,比较条件和结果以及在干预背景和理论基础方面的进一步考虑,存在更大的多样性以及在干预措施之内和之间的相互作用,因此评估适用性可能会面临挑战。我们建议评论作者计划并进行分析,以解释效果的差异,并回答有关作用机制以及不同环境,环境和人群的影响的问题。我们还建议评论作者对设置的背景,实施细节,资源使用以及所纳入研究的背景提供丰富的描述,并评估至少一个目标人群,设置和背景的适用性。这应有助于最终用户进行适用性评估。需要就术语达成共识,并应制定指南,以综合审查中的实施信息以及审查作者的适用性判断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号