首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Epidemiology >Use of the stepped wedge design cannot be recommended: A critical appraisal and comparison with the classic cluster randomized controlled trial design
【24h】

Use of the stepped wedge design cannot be recommended: A critical appraisal and comparison with the classic cluster randomized controlled trial design

机译:不建议使用阶梯式楔形设计:严格的评估,并与经典聚类随机对照试验设计进行比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In a conventional randomized controlled trial (RCT), participants are randomly allocated to either an intervention or a control/comparison condition. However, for certain types of interventions, it is not valid to randomize participants at an individual level because contamination between the intervention and control groups can occur. In those situations, an alternative approach is to randomize entire groups of participants (clusters) to the two conditions. Studies using this type of design are typically called cluster RCTs.
机译:在常规的随机对照试验(RCT)中,将参与者随机分配到干预措施或对照/比较条件中。但是,对于某些类型的干预措施,将参与者随机分成个体级别是无效的,因为干预措施和对照组之间可能会发生污染。在这种情况下,另一种方法是将整个参与者组(集群)随机分配到这两个条件。使用此类设计的研究通常称为聚类RCT。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号