首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery >Contrast sensitivity measurement with 2 contrast sensitivity tests in normal eyes and eyes with cataract.
【24h】

Contrast sensitivity measurement with 2 contrast sensitivity tests in normal eyes and eyes with cataract.

机译:在正常眼和白内障眼中,使用2个对比敏感度测试进行对比敏感度测量。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To assess the reliability of and correlation between 2 contrast sensitivity tests in normal eyes and eyes with cataract. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. METHODS: The Vision Contrast Test System (wall-chart test) and Optec 6500 system (view-in test) were used to measure contrast sensitivity in normal eyes at 2 visits separated by 2 weeks and in eyes with cataract before and 2 months after cataract surgery. The test-retest reliability and correlation were calculated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of repeatability (COR), and 95% range of difference using the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: The study evaluated 40 normal eyes of 20 subjects and 44 eyes of 38 cataract patients. The repeatability of the 2 test methods was generally acceptable. The view-in test performed better than the wall-chart test in the ICC analysis (0.85 versus 0.65) but not in the COR analysis (+/-0.20 log versus +/-0.27 log). Correlation between the 2 tests was poor in both groups of eyes. The ceiling effect was greater with the wall-chart test. The floor effect occurred mainly in patients with cataract, in which it was greater preoperatively than postoperatively; at high frequency; and with the view-in test. CONCLUSION: Based on the ceiling and floor effect, the view-in test is better for detecting subtle contrast sensitivity changes in normal or near-normal eyes and the wall-chart test is useful in eyes with compromised vision. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
机译:目的:评估在正常眼和白内障眼中两种对比敏感度测试的可靠性和相关性。地点:韩国首尔延世大学附属医院眼科。方法:使用视觉对比度测试系统(挂图测试)和Optec 6500系统(观看测试)在白内障之前和之后2个月的2次探视和2个月白内障患者的正常眼睛中测量对比敏感度手术。使用类内相关系数(ICC),重复性系数(COR)和95%的差异范围,使用Bland-Altman方法计算重测信度和相关性。结果:该研究评估了20位受试者的40只正常眼和38位白内障患者的44只眼。两种测试方法的可重复性通常是可以接受的。在ICC分析中,观看测试的性能比挂图测试更好(0.85对0.65),而在COR分析中则不如挂图测试(+/- 0.20 log对+/- 0.27 log)。两组眼睛的2个测试之间的相关性较差。挂图测试对天花板的影响更大。地面效应主要发生在白内障患者中,术前效果优于术后。高频地以及观看测试。结论:基于天花板和地板的影响,入视测试可更好地检测正常或接近正常的眼睛中细微的对比敏感度变化,壁挂图测试对于视力受损的眼睛非常有用。财务披露:没有任何作者对所提及的任何材料或方法有财务或所有权利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号