首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery >Comparison of monochromatic aberrations in young adults with different visual acuity and refractive errors
【24h】

Comparison of monochromatic aberrations in young adults with different visual acuity and refractive errors

机译:不同视力和屈光不正的年轻人的单色像差比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose To compare the monochromatic aberrations in a large cohort of 20-year-old Australians with differing levels of visual acuity and explore the relationship between these aberrations and refractive error. Setting Lions Eye Institute, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. Design Cross-sectional analysis of a population-based cohort. Methods Monochromatic aberrations were measured using a Zywave II wavefront aberrometer with natural pupils in a dark room. The logMAR corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was measured monocularly under normal illumination. Cycloplegic autorefraction was also performed. Results The study enrolled 2039 eyes of 1040 participants. Data from 1007 right eyes were analyzed. The median CDVA and spherical equivalent were -0.06 logMAR (interquartile range [IQR], -0.10 to 0.00) and +0.25 diopters (D) (IQR, -0.38 to 0.63), respectively. The median 6.0 mm higher-order aberration (HOA) was 0.58 μm (IQR, 0.44 to 0.79). Coma-like aberrations and 3rd-, 4th-, and 5th-order HOAs were significantly different between subjects with a CDVA of -0.10 logMAR or better and those with a CDVA worse than -0.10 logMAR. Fourth-order aberrations Z(4,-4) (P=.024) and Z(4,-2) (P=.029) and 2nd-order aberration Z(2,0) (P<.001) differed significantly between myopic eyes, emmetropic eyes, and hyperopic eyes. Subjects with higher myopia had slightly higher total HOAs. Conclusions The HOAs in this population were marginally higher than previously reported values. The findings confirm there is a difference in monochromatic aberrations between different vision and refractive groups. Results in this study will benefit decision-making processes in the clinical setting. Financial Disclosure No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
机译:目的比较20岁的澳大利亚大批不同视力水平的单色像差,并探讨这些像差与屈光不正之间的关系。澳大利亚西澳大利亚州珀斯的Lions Eye Institute学院。设计基于人群的队列的横断面分析。方法使用Zywave II波前像差仪在黑暗的房间里用自然瞳孔测量单色像差。在正常照明下单眼测量logMAR校正的距离视敏度(CDVA)。还进行了眼睑自折射。结果该研究招募了1040名参与者的2039眼。分析了来自1007个右眼的数据。 CDVA和球面等效值的中位数分别为-0.06 logMAR(四分位间距[IQR],-0.10至0.00)和+0.25屈光度(D)(IQR,-0.38至0.63)。中值6.0毫米高阶像差(HOA)为0.58μm(IQR,0.44至0.79)。 CDVA为-0.10 logMAR或更高的受试者与CDVA低于-0.10 logMAR的受试者之间的昏迷状像差和三阶,四阶和五阶HOA显着不同。四阶像差Z(4,-4)(P = .024)和Z(4,-2)(P = .029)和二阶像差Z(2,0)(P <.001)有显着差异在近视眼,正视眼和远视眼之间。近视度较高的受试者的总HOA略高。结论该人群的HOA略高于先前报告的值。这些发现证实了不同的视觉和屈光组之间的单色像差存在差异。这项研究的结果将有益于临床环境中的决策过程。财务披露没有任何作者对所提及的任何材料或方法有财务或专有利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号