首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical nursing >To DeZarn's commentary on Darbyshire P (2004) 'Rage against the machine?': nurses' and midwives' experiences of using computerized patient information systems for clinical information.
【24h】

To DeZarn's commentary on Darbyshire P (2004) 'Rage against the machine?': nurses' and midwives' experiences of using computerized patient information systems for clinical information.

机译:对于DeZarn对Darbyshire P(2004)“机器的愤怒”的评论:护士和助产士使用计算机病人信息系统获取临床信息的经验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In her response to my paper, 'Rage against the machine' (Darbyshire 2004), DeZarn (2006) makes an important contribution to our understandings of the organizational, managerial and practice contexts within which Computerized Patient Information Systems (CPIS) are introduced. We may, however, differ as to what that importance is.DeZarn's (2006) seems the classic managerial response to workers who do not immediately fall over themselves to embrace the latest 'innovation'. That response is invariably to locate the 'problem' within clinicians and practitioners who, by their questioning, doubting, challenging or even their less-than-enthusiastic acceptance of the latest 'enhancement', demonstrate their 'resistance to change'(Darbyshire 2001). Within this managerial worldview, it is almost inconceivable that there may be something problematic about the actual 'innovation' or change itself. Its desirability and efficacy are givens. The irony is not lost on clinicians that a system which, on the one hand, demands that they be 'critical' 'reflective' and 'questioning' in relation to their own clinical practice can become decidedly uneasy when they turn this critical gaze to bear on the latest managerial 'change strategy' 're-organization' or 'new system'.
机译:DeZarn(2006)在对我的论文《机器的愤怒》(Darbyshire 2004)的回应中,为我们对引入计算机化患者信息系统(CPIS)的组织,管理和实践环境的理解做出了重要贡献。然而,我们在重要性上可能会有所不同。DeZarn(2006)似乎是对那些不立即屈服于接受最新“创新”的工人的经典管理回应。这种反应总是将“问题”定位在临床医生和从业者中,他们通过质疑,怀疑,挑战甚至对最新“增强”的热情不足,表现出他们对变革的“抵抗力”(Darbyshire 2001)。 。在这种管理世界观中,几乎无法想象的是,实际的“创新”或变革本身可能存在问题。给出了其合意性和功效。具有讽刺意味的是,对于临床医生来说,一方面要求他们对自己的临床实践“批判”,“反思”和“质疑”的系统,当他们把批判性的视线转为承受时,可能会变得非常不安。最新的管理“变革策略”,“重组”或“新系统”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号