...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical nursing >Commentary on Armitage G (2005) Drug errors, qualitative research and some reflections on ethics. Journal of Clinical Nursing 14, 869-875.
【24h】

Commentary on Armitage G (2005) Drug errors, qualitative research and some reflections on ethics. Journal of Clinical Nursing 14, 869-875.

机译:关于Armitage G的评论(2005)毒品错误,定性研究和对道德的一些思考。临床护理杂志14,869-875。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There are many professionals involved in the process of medication including physicians, pharmacists and nurses. They each have their own roles in prescribing, dispensing and administering medication. Tasks related to medication are amongst the most frequent practices in health care organizations, and the consequences of medication error are well known. Thus, research on medication error is increasing.The study of methodological and ethical issues related to qualitative methods is not a novelty in the literature (Mays & Pope 1995, Mangione-Smith et al. 2002, Mulhall 2003). Even the article of Armitage (2005) on drug errors within the National Health System in the UK using observational method points out the ethical issues surrounding it.
机译:有很多专业人员参与药物治疗,包括医师,药剂师和护士。他们在处方,分配和管理药物方面都有自己的作用。与药物有关的任务是卫生保健组织中最常见的实践之一,药物错误的后果众所周知。因此,对用药错误的研究正在增加。与定性方法有关的方法学和伦理学问题的研究在文献中并不是什么新鲜事(Mays&Pope 1995,Mangione-Smith et al。2002,Mulhall 2003)。甚至关于使用观察方法在英国国家卫生系统内进行药物错误的Armitage(2005)文章也指出了围绕它的伦理问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号